Autopsy The Headless Ritual
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
pissbore
July 5th 2013


12778 Comments


honestly im not gonna bother to fetch a list for you because if you honestly care about any of this shit you'll do it yourself and you'll actually gain from it that way, as i ALREADY STATED in an earlier post

Wizard
July 5th 2013


20629 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

Sorry for starting this whole horseshit argument. Make peace and love to dm!

pissbore
July 5th 2013


12778 Comments


with that out of the way, i do believe my work here is done, if anyone has further questions/stupid comments/spiteful reactionary words feel free to come forth with them and i will answer them in due time

FearThyEvil
July 5th 2013


19397 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Ugh, that's where every argument ends sadly. Someone states they found facts from somewhere, person asks for proof of facts, all of the sudden the facts are not important and not worth showing.

FearThyEvil
July 5th 2013


19397 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

and yes i am going to use it against you because you;re a hypocrite. you haven't proved anything youve said either and are just making generalizations about what i've said. the thing is, everything i've referred to is COMMON KNOWLEDGE amongst people who understand the evolution of 80s metal and the fact that you're even asking for sources is sad



Lastly, if it's such common knowledge, how come you're the only one who seems to know it?

ShadowRemains
July 5th 2013


28667 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

with that out of the way, i do believe my work here is done, if anyone has further questions/stupid comments/spiteful reactionary words feel free to come forth with them and i will answer them in due time




lol

pissbore
July 5th 2013


12778 Comments


because it's common knowledge amongst:

a) people who actually went through the evolution of the scene/were a part of it (people who actually lived during the 80s)

b) people who actually do their research, of which on sputnik, are a minority

i dont think theres more than 5 sputnikkers in the a) category, and probably no more than that in the b) category either

pissbore
July 5th 2013


12778 Comments


Ugh, that's where every argument ends sadly. Someone states they found facts from somewhere, person asks for proof of facts, all of the sudden the facts are not important and not worth showing.


what, specifically, would you like proof of?

Wizard
July 5th 2013


20629 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

You make it too easy Pissbore. Gonna go listen to some DEATH STRIKE cuz they bez old schoolzz!

ShadowRemains
July 5th 2013


28667 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

i dont think theres more than 5 sputnikkers in the a) category, and probably no more than that in the b) category

either




and where's you proof on the line there?



nowhere



it's speculation and assuming

ShadowRemains
July 5th 2013


28667 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

and yes karl i second your notion, death strike is razor sharp

pissbore
July 5th 2013


12778 Comments


re-reading the thread i will say that i wasn't articulate enough in describing how sodom's debut could be considered death metal, because i didn't think it was necessary

like if you can hear the death metal in hellhammer and celtic frost how the fuck can you not hear it in sodom's debut? i don't play guitar and im not very good at describing music with words so it's hard for me to "describe it's death-metalness" but like just LISTEN to the fucking album and imagine its 84 and youre hearing it for the first time... that's fucking death metal to your ears my friend



pissbore
July 5th 2013


12778 Comments


fuck yeah death strike rules, hail

Hawks
Staff Reviewer
July 5th 2013


116209 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

Wtf is going on in this thread?

pissbore
July 5th 2013


12778 Comments


and where's you proof on the line there?

nowhere

it's speculation and assuming
yes, it was speculation and assuming, whats your point? do you see how arbitrary you are making this? prolonging for the sake of prolonging

ahh, sputnik

pissbore
July 5th 2013


12778 Comments


go to like page 10 or 11 hawks when viper first said "its not old school at all" in regards to the cover artwork

demigod!
July 5th 2013


49662 Comments


gonna listen to this now i hope it rocks



FearThyEvil
July 5th 2013


19397 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

what, specifically, would you like proof of?



How many times do I have to say it? Any of the albums you brought up earlier that are supposedly dm. For example Bathory's s/t and Sodom In the Sign of Evil. Two albums you said were dm.

ShadowRemains
July 5th 2013


28667 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

yes, it was speculation and assuming, whats your point? do you see how arbitrary you are making this? prolonging for the sake of prolonging




because i have to go to work soon and there's not enough time to do anything else before then, but i guess that is completely arbitrary



and my point is that when you speculate and assume, people won't take you seriously

pissbore
July 5th 2013


12778 Comments


fear, i didn't say they were dm as in that they are objectively dm, obviously that would be retarded,
and if you misinterpreted my comment as such, that's on you

i said they could be considered early examples of dm and at the time, in the 80s, they certainly were


death metal and black metal were never mutually exclusive terms until the 90s, i hope you do realize
this

in order for me to "prove" what i just said, i'd need a time machine



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy