Radiohead In Rainbows
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
robertsona
Emeritus
November 5th 2009


28661 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

lol u mad

cirq
November 5th 2009


9366 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

[img]http://classweb.his.ac.jp/mscomp/files/2009/03/angry_german_kid.jpg[/img]



Waior
November 5th 2009


11778 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

So, just listened to this again and I guess it's my favorite Radiohead record now

AtavanHalen
November 6th 2009


17919 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

REALLY, Caleb? REALLY?

SeaAnemone
November 6th 2009


21427 Comments


Great decision, waior.

Tulannical
November 6th 2009


2051 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Not.

Fluorine
December 3rd 2009


104 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I don't think you can really poke a hole in this album. It's so concise, consistent, intriguing, and...good.

So now I'm thinking that there are various reason why this isn't considered an OK Computer-esque classic.

1. It is because it's still slightly new

2. Radiohead are now veterans who have already cemented themselves as modern legends. People only care about bands when they're young.

3. They already have 3 records in that debatable classic range. Adding a fourth is too much.

Knott-
Emeritus
December 3rd 2009


10259 Comments


Doesn't feel as complete as the rest of their stuff - doesn't flow as well. The 2CD format is part of the reason.

Observer
Emeritus
December 3rd 2009


9480 Comments


The two cd format threw me off as well. I'm still not sure if those are supposed to be b-sides or not.

myhigherpie
December 3rd 2009


3029 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

but this isn't a double album. the 2nd cd just comes with the special edition or something. the actual album is the first cd.

robertsona
Emeritus
December 3rd 2009


28661 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

it's a bonus disc you guys come on

Observer
Emeritus
December 3rd 2009


9480 Comments


So they are definitely b-sides?

Prophet178
December 3rd 2009


6397 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

The only thing that doesn't flow well with this album is Nude after Bodysnatchers, other than that it's perfect.

robertsona
Emeritus
December 3rd 2009


28661 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

yeah theyre b-sides just released kinda strangely as "disc 2" but it's def not a double album

Tulannical
December 3rd 2009


2051 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

huh i've never heard the 2nd disc; how is it compared to the first?

robertsona
Emeritus
December 3rd 2009


28661 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

not as good at all

Satellite
December 3rd 2009


26539 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Disagreed. "Down is the New Up" is the best song on the entire album as far as I'm concerned, and both of the MK tracks rule.

robertsona
Emeritus
December 3rd 2009


28661 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

down is the new up is my favorite off disc 2



last flowers is ok



4 minute warning is very good



bangers and mash...eh



but yeah





it's not bad by any means but it's not as good as this





also the mk tracks are kinda like filler to me and i dont use that word very often

Mikesn
Emeritus
December 3rd 2009


3707 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

it's been a while since i've listened to disc 2...but down is the new up is solid



and this flows perfectly

CelestialDust
December 3rd 2009


3170 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

disc 2 feels like an EP, it's just as great as disc 1 in my opinion,



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy