In Flames Foregone
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
DungeonBoy
February 23rd 2023


9759 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

End the Transmission might be the worst song on here. It's pretty clear which solos are Chris', Bjorn isn't exactly a fretboard ripper, and Chris has a unique sense of melody oftentimes leaving you thinking, huh well that certainly is a note choice

Eakflanderyof
February 23rd 2023


5528 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"most of the solo work is Bjorn's iirc but I wouldn't be surprised if Chris wrote a few of them"



Just upon listening i really doubt this. The soloing sounds way different this album than it ever has. Plus, what I've read is that they wrote everything but they had Chris come in and lay down solos.



The only solos that sound like it might be Björn stylistically to me are dialogue and bleeding out

Eakflanderyof
February 23rd 2023


5528 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

@dungeonboy



Yeah, his note choice is pretty distinctly different from Björn

Flugmorph
February 23rd 2023


34516 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

"Yeah, end the transmissiom gives me slightly "this is our house" vibes with the chorus and I don't like that. The main riff is pretty good though"



definitely

Flugmorph
February 24th 2023


34516 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

holy shit in flames resurrected Insurrection pog momento numero quattro

valek
February 24th 2023


430 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Wow, this is a big surprise, I checked because a friend told me they were actually "back" and he wasn't THAT wrong, it is far from a masterpiece, really hit and miss and the clean vocals are pretty meh but other than that I could enjoy a few songs.

DungeonBoy
February 24th 2023


9759 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I honestly don't understand the whole In Flames is back thing for this record. It's not a return to their early years TJR-Clayman (or whatever you deem their last good album), and more inline with their middle era (Come Clarity-Sounds of a Playground Fading), so maybe if that's where you discovered In Flames, it would be back I suppose. If by back, you mean less commercial than the last 3, I could also see that.

Flugmorph
February 24th 2023


34516 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

don't break a leg trying to be positive over there valek, looks painful

Kusangii
February 24th 2023


6727 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Or he's just being honest.

drasticaction74
February 24th 2023


1944 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I think it's only a true "return" in the sense that the song structures are rock solid again and have classic IF tropes, Bjorn is really the arbiter there. the unfortunate truth however is we have to resign ourselves to big cheesy choruses and terrible Anders lyrics in between these great instrumental moments. I don't think we'll ever get closer than this to Come Clarity -era glory. Comparing this to Clayman is generous though

Gmork89
February 24th 2023


8693 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Bleeding Out is quite the earworm.

peartnoy
February 24th 2023


2216 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Yeah man best chorus on this probably

Gmork89
February 24th 2023


8693 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"Comparing this to Clayman is generous though"



Not in the same universe honestly haha, it is good though.

Muzz79
February 25th 2023


3094 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I love this thing

StormChaser
February 28th 2023


2151 Comments


should I even give this a chance if I hated everything post CC by them?

Flugmorph
February 28th 2023


34516 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

stay away

StormChaser
February 28th 2023


2151 Comments


will do, thanks

peartnoy
February 28th 2023


2216 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Dafuq Flugmorph no this is exactly the album to try if you hated their recent stuff.



StormChaser at least try the song Foregone or The Great Deceiver. No clean vocal choruses in those.

Flugmorph
February 28th 2023


34516 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

i just find such questions kind of absurd lol

DaveyMonsoon
March 1st 2023


1132 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Alright, now delving into this. I don't... hate it so far. Granted, it's not good by any means, and I definitely agree with previous comments on the whole "In Flames is back" remarks being anything but hyperbole, but it's serviceable at the very least.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy