For all I know maybe all the 8 studio albums they recorded while Bonzo lived had some ripped-off material. But I don't give a flying fuck.
And I guess most Sputnikers don't either.
|
| |
Most people don't
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Same, as long as it's fucking fantastic music I don't give a fuck.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
It's like sampling without actually sampling! : D
|
| |
So, about dat drumming on OotT...
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Ok guys I think we've given Snide enough shit.
|
| |
OotT ftw
SIBLY is close tho.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
@Fripp: Prob
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Futures it's a must, not a might.
|
| |
@Fripper: one of 'em fo sho.
And yeah Futures, I suggest you start with Houses, I think it's their
most accesible work.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Nah, start with 4, then spread from there.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Led Zeppelin did take a lot from other bands on their first few albums, but let's be honest here, blues isn't exactly the most varied genre out there. Not to discredit the genre and the greatness that has come out of it, but as fallenbird said, there are only so many note sequences in a scale, and with blues those are limited even moreso.
But what I've noticed about critics of LZ (and plenty others) is that these songs will sound similar to another song from years past, but it'll just be some random song that some I doubt the musicians who "stole" it even heard. If I made a song and someone told me that I stole it from some artist I have never even heard, would that still be stealing?
Now, I could be wrong with that previous statement, but unless LZ were absolute geniuses in ripping off other obscure blues artists, the fact of the matter is that the album (and their discography in general) practically invented the heavy metal genre (along with Sabbath and others, of course), and changing the face of music is impressive, whether you like it or not.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Houses is awesome. I feel like all Zep is accessible except III and ITTOD, so any of the other 6 would work.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
4 is their most accessible though
|
| |
Houses, then IV and II (in the order you like), then this and I (in the order you like), and then PG is the order I suggest.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Not a bad idea
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Don't forget Presence the underrated gem.
|
| |
The last 2 are tough cookies imo, and opinions are split there.
I'm excluding the poshumous release known commonly as Coda.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I don't know why people are so split on Presence. To me it's just 7 wonderful songs that are up to Zep standards.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Presence is fine but I think we can all agree that ITTOD is their worst (outside of Coda) and you could probably go without listening to it.
|
| |
|
|
