Tame Impala Currents
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 22nd 2015


70256 Comments


o wait i had it backwards lol rowans on the turd side

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 22nd 2015


70256 Comments


i dunno everyone says this is just shitty overly accessible beatles worship and im inclined to believe them so that means its pretty much objectively worse than their past albs

Rowan5215
Emeritus
November 22nd 2015


48443 Comments

Album Rating: 3.6

this ain't Beatles worship it would need WAY more sitar tbh

JamieTwort
November 22nd 2015


26988 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This is definitely their least Beatles worship-y album.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 22nd 2015


70256 Comments


ive heard thats super not true from reliable sources sorry

JamieTwort
November 22nd 2015


26988 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

lol it's not even open to debate.

JamieTwort
November 22nd 2015


26988 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This is like synth pop whereas their previous albums were actually psychedelic Beatles worship.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 22nd 2015


70256 Comments


pretty much everything u say is open to debate tbh

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 22nd 2015


70256 Comments


getting a bit big for the britches basically ;]

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 22nd 2015


70256 Comments


if this is more synth poppy i might actually check it then cuz i dig that hard but ive just heard so many disappointing things about this

Rowan5215
Emeritus
November 22nd 2015


48443 Comments

Album Rating: 3.6

there's very little guitar on this at all, it's pretty swee

JamieTwort
November 22nd 2015


26988 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

If you heard negative things about this from whoever told you this was Beatles worship you may as well discard what you heard because they are obviously unreliable as fuck.

JamieTwort
November 22nd 2015


26988 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

But I am almost certain that you won't like this as much as their Beatles worship stuff.

Archael
November 23rd 2015


1163 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah this is cygnificantly less beatles like than their past material. As i said, more dreamy synth pop, with some psych and r&b flavours scattered around.



Edit: ^lol that auto correct.

Spacesh1p
November 23rd 2015


7716 Comments


Yeah Jamie speaking the truth here. If this is Beatles worship either your sources are holding out large volumes of unreleased material or they haven't listened to the Beatles.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 23rd 2015


70256 Comments


will download. i honestly dont even remember who told me it was beatles worship hard. all i know is ive heard from many people that it sucks ass. we'll see.

Spacesh1p
November 23rd 2015


7716 Comments


Definitely doesn't suck ass. The production alone, in my opinion, is worth hearing as it sounds excellent even if the music isn't overly compelling throughout the whole listen.

Lord(e)Po)))ts
November 23rd 2015


70256 Comments


this review makes me feel like im gonna find it overproduced tbh

deathschool
November 23rd 2015


29482 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

It's not that its overproduced so much as it relies more on the fact that it has omgsopretty production than it does on quality songwriting.

Rowan5215
Emeritus
November 23rd 2015


48443 Comments

Album Rating: 3.6

Yeah it is kinda overproduced but not obnoxiously so



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy