Album Rating: 2.5

self-indulgent wankery right here, also, boring

Album Rating: 4.0

again...this album barely wanks

Album Rating: 2.5

you think they've ever heard dinosaur jr?

This is basically wank metal so why listen to it if you don't like wank?

Album Rating: 2.5

agreed

ah

Album Rating: 4.5

i don't care what this is, it's amazing so yuck fou

Album Rating: 4.0

The second track blows me every time

Album Rating: 4.5

I wish tracks blew me

Album Rating: 4.5

get your audio bj on man

Album Rating: 4.5

stick your weiner in the subwoofer hole

Album Rating: 4.0

why is this album still sitting on my cd rack and why have I not listened to it yet?

Album Rating: 3.0

technical prowess: 5

lush: 5.5

individuality of each track: 1.5

progressing the genre: 3

production value: 5

kittens: 0



overall: rock solid 3.3 /: ...3.5

Album Rating: 4.0

It's the second best thing they've done. The collective is on another level entirely though.

Album Rating: 4.0

yeah i'm gonna have to agree with mike

Album Rating: 4.5

I wouldn't consider this wank.

Wank tends to be really simplistic harmonically with no melodies. Like playing a bunch of scales ascending/descending, constant sweep picking/arpeggios, and really basic phrasing. Like kids you see in Guitar Center that try to show of their "skills."

Scale the Summit tends to stay away from wankery even though they're instrumental.





I agree with Mike, The Collective had a stronger impact on me and is much more memorable.

Album Rating: 3.0

lol at this being wank. the focus here is good arrangements and nice melodies. not to mention a lot of it is pretty fucking

simple

Rules.

Album Rating: 3.0

indeed

Album Rating: 4.5

I was replying to a comment about someone calling this wank, if there were any misunderstandings.



The thing is sometime something that's easy on the ears can actually be pretty complex. Complexity isn't all about speed or how hard something is to play the composing side is a big part of it too.