Radiohead The King of Limbs
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
ihopeuchoke
February 25th 2011


668 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Hit the nail on the head, Kubrick.

Observer
Emeritus
February 25th 2011


9480 Comments


ah, but it is

mothercountry
February 25th 2011


447 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

lewis, your soundoff is golden.

tinkrbel
February 25th 2011


1695 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

just saw this on moaropeth:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V-lYxXhjeU&feature=player_embedded#at=32

the great post-dubstep ambient trance soul record the world has been waiting for


i didn't know the world was waiting for such an album

fsharptrit0ne
February 25th 2011


4816 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

http://www.xlrecordings.com/radiohead



Now XL put something on their website about all this speculation of another part to TKOL.. hmmmmm

foreverendeared
February 25th 2011


14746 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Just got around to reading this and i thought it would be worth noting that the hat Thom Yorke is wearing in the Lotus Flower video is not a fedora as the review mentions.

tinkrbel
February 25th 2011


1695 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

the hat Thom Yorke is wearing in the Lotus Flower video is not a fedora as the review mentions.


OMG! i'm SOOO outraged right now, i wish i could neg this review because of that mistake



Uranium
February 25th 2011


7549 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

neg'd

DarkNoctus
February 25th 2011


12819 Comments


i just listened to this

i didn't get it so i won't rate~

Anthracks
February 25th 2011


8408 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

People were looking too hard for an album that screamed greatness and missed one that whispers it.




absolutely

Scoot
February 25th 2011


24176 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

it's not bad at all

Knott-
Emeritus
February 25th 2011


10259 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

People were looking too hard for an album that screamed greatness and missed one that whispers it.




Fuck, so I've just not been listening hard enough?



It sounds smart the way you put it though. Just a shame it isn't.

Kubrick
February 25th 2011


793 Comments


Fuck, so I've just not been listening hard enough?

It sounds smart the way you put it though. Just a shame it isn't.


Honestly I think there's at least some validity to that statement. It probably doesn't apply to everyone (does anything ever?) but my main point was that a lot of people went into this record expecting to be absolutely blown away. But, the record itself is extremely subdued and the true strength of it lies in its subtleties: album cohesiveness, song arrangement/album progression, and continuity of atmosphere (all of which are complemented by its brevity). The nature of the album doesn't lend itself to the instant gratification that many people were searching for. So, those people that expected such instant gratification and to hear singularly stunning songs such as those that were found on In Rainbows likely overlooked what the album really has to offer in their disappointment of not hearing what they expected.

I'm not saying you're one of those people, and that everyone who doesn't enjoy this album doesn't get it or isn't "listening hard enough" as you put it (why is it that everyone seems to jump to that?). I'm simply saying the album is one that thrives on subtlety as opposed to theatrics, and it's hard to really appreciate the subtlety when all you're doing is searching for the theatrics. It just seems like a lot of people are listening to this album within the context of what they wanted it to be instead of what they actually got, and that context makes it much harder to appreciate the album for what it is.

EDIT: I realized this probably needs clarifcation.. The statement I was referring to as having some validity was the one I previously made that you were responding to, not your statement that you aren't listening to this hard enough. Just trying to avoid any uncessary confrontation haha.

Avirov
February 25th 2011


1206 Comments


Kubrick you are a fucking wordsmith

Piglet
February 25th 2011


8564 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

You make make a review out of that, I'm not even joking.

Kubrick
February 25th 2011


793 Comments


Haha thanks man. Concision clearly isn't my strong suit though haha. I think I might have the longest average comment on this site (which probably also means least read I would imagine). Appreciate the vote of confidence though!

Uranium
February 25th 2011


7549 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

album's cool.



conspiracy theories....

go back to 9/11...... AT LEAST YOU HAD SOMETHING,

dixoncocks
February 25th 2011


3247 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I thought this was an interesting site



http://thekingoflimbspart2.blogspot.com/

zoso33
February 25th 2011


627 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

everyone better be ready bc if you think this is over then ur wrong: ie kida amnesiacishniss

starry
February 25th 2011


552 Comments


"So, those people that expected such instant gratification and to hear singularly stunning songs such as those that were found on In Rainbows likely overlooked what the album really has to offer in their disappointment of not hearing what they expected."

What about those who didn't think In Rainbows had 'singularly stunning songs'?



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy