Cynic Traced in Air
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
fireaboveicebelow
September 3rd 2009


6835 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

haha no shit, god everyone with 5/5 ratings makes the stupidest arguments

FadeToBlack
September 3rd 2009


11043 Comments


/hasn't even listened to it yet

FadeToBlack
September 3rd 2009


11043 Comments


yah I have both Focus and this but haven't got round to listening to them yet. from what I've heard this sounds great, but def. not a 5

AtavanHalen
September 3rd 2009


17919 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

It isn't the greatest album ever it just fucking slays.

Ulsufyring
September 3rd 2009


1748 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

it's barely metal so its slaying power isn't very great

Greggers
September 3rd 2009


2375 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

FadeToBlack you need to listen to both of them, they're excellent

NOTINTHEFACE
September 3rd 2009


2167 Comments


Focus is better. But this is good. Not perfect, but still good.

Ulsufyring
September 3rd 2009


1748 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

well benzum i'm assuming the dog means you're surprised



this album is not death metal even slightly, and what sub-genre it WOULD fit into in metal is vague at best



the only real "metal" songs are tracks 4, 5 and 6... rest are kind of alt-rock-y

Ulsufyring
September 3rd 2009


1748 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

it was very surprised to be on a decent television show

Gyromania
Contributing Reviewer
September 11th 2009


38348 Comments


"It isn't the greatest album ever it just fucking slays."

yeah well, you gave new muse a rating of 2.5, so i sadly cannot trust your opinion

i think it's kind of retarded that people refer to this as 'metal'; even more retarded that some refer to it as 'death metal' but w.e

Bfhurricane
September 11th 2009


6284 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Your post is dually confusing. The new Muse is average and this is metal. I don't see how you can argue against any of those.

Gyromania
Contributing Reviewer
September 11th 2009


38348 Comments


well, number one: in your opinion, w/e. number two: the lead vocalist always sounds euphonious and there is so much jazz in here. calling it metal is kind of dumb IMO

bloc
September 11th 2009


70880 Comments


i would simply call it progressive metal; focus is closer to death metal but perhaps not there yet.

Gyromania
Contributing Reviewer
September 11th 2009


38348 Comments


more like hip hop mirite

fireaboveicebelow
September 11th 2009


6835 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

this is borderline metal but it is retarded people call either record death metal, and yes the new muse is boring but so are all their cds

Gyromania
Contributing Reviewer
September 11th 2009


38348 Comments


dan... wtf? sometimes i hate you but i agree, calling either death metal is retarded.

Bfhurricane
September 11th 2009


6284 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Well I was just trying to be a bit of a buzzkill on my Muse comment, it's actually a decent album. And there may be some jazz influence here, but it would hardly qualify as jazz... Steely Dan and Billy Joel are lots more jazzy. It's overwhelmingly heavy metal

Gyromania
Contributing Reviewer
September 11th 2009


38348 Comments


i wasn't trying to ever classify it as jazz LOL. claiming it's 'overwhelmingly heavy metal' is kind of a false statement... have you ever heard any heavy metal?

fireaboveicebelow
September 11th 2009


6835 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

uh oh

ordos
September 11th 2009


14 Comments


album is overwheliging heavy metal guys sunds like maiden and priest u kno those heavy metal rocksers



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy