Metallica Master Of Puppets
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
metallicaman8
October 20th 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

i liked youre opposite review though im not sure if anyone would rate it a 0.




0 is the opposite rating of 5



C20H25N3O
October 20th 2006


583 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

This is the most incredible review ever........

You have changed my life.



You are the Rodan of Mx reviewers now.

Patrick
October 20th 2006


1891 Comments


i just read the argument between the boy and girl 'cuz it was awesome

metallicaman8
October 20th 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I really haven't bothered to read any of this, because it doesn't interest me in any fashion. Just figured I should prove this isn't the longest review on sputnik.




I copied that one into Microsoft word and did word count. Mine is like 2000 words longer.

Zmev
October 20th 2006


983 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

In the time I’ve spent here in Sputnik I’ve been responsible for the birth of a few different types of reviews.




Well, lets not be too full of ourselves!This Message Edited On 10.20.06

MrKite
October 20th 2006


5020 Comments


lol^

MisterPilgrim
October 20th 2006


233 Comments


And out of those few different types of reviews only one is worth anything.

metallicaman8
October 20th 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Alright you fellas (Bron, Chan, Iluv) have made your points. Let's stop it there k? I don't want this to end up all spammy and what not.

Neoteric
October 20th 2006


3243 Comments


Leave him alone guys, you can see he's worked extremely hard on this. Even if the writing isn't that great, he still gets an A for effort.

AnyColour74
October 20th 2006


1054 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

the writing is fine, leave him beThis Message Edited On 10.20.06

Zmev
October 20th 2006


983 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Leave him alone guys, you can see he's worked extremely hard on this. Even if the writing isn't that great, he still gets an A for effort.




Not the point. It was well written but the point of it wasn't to actually review the album. Its more of a "hey guys look how much i can type!" thing. Or at least it seemed like that.



edit: and that skit with bratty girl and whatever was just dumbThis Message Edited On 10.20.06

metallicaman8
October 20th 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I read the overall, thought it was good, figured it would be vote worthy, then I read the tbt. And holy shi, not only did you take a hit in overall writing quality, it was so redundant and utterly lifeless and boring, I wanted to strangle my computer. When I realized I couldn't, I got reel reel reel sad




The tbt is sort of supposed to be boring. It's not for people who have already heard the album (which i think I mentioned in the explanation). It was supposed to be for people who haven't heard the album and are curious about exactly what to expect from the songs.



EDIT:



Not the point. It was well written but the point of it wasn't to actually review the album. Its more of a "hey guys look how much i can type!" thing. Or at least it seemed like that.




No, it was more so that I had been in a reviewing slump. So, I thought doing this would please everyone because it has long detailed reviews and short, somewhat humorous, mildly informative reviews for people who don't like to read so much. It's purpose was pretty much to try and make everyone happy. I failed.This Message Edited On 10.20.06

MisterPilgrim
October 20th 2006


233 Comments


I already said the writing was good for the most part, minus the bad sentence structure or grammar here or there. My main complaint is the format is ridiculous, effort or not. Most reviewers do put effort into their reviews, yer know.

tom79
October 20th 2006


3964 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

[quote=mm]It was supposed to be for people who haven't heard the album and are curious about exactly what to expect from the songs.[/quote]

Who is curious to read exactly what happens in the songs? Even if they haven't heard it. Not many.This Message Edited On 10.20.06

Neoteric
October 20th 2006


3243 Comments


Good point, though I liked parts of the review. To Zmev.

And Chan, shut up, you aren't a vet and you aren't respected on this site so stop going around thinking you are.This Message Edited On 10.20.06

MisterPilgrim
October 20th 2006


233 Comments


Neoteric, I'm sorry to say this, but when it comes to intelligence and actual reviewing, I think Chan has you beat pretty easily.

Zmev
October 20th 2006


983 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

No, it was more so that I had been in a reviewing slump. So, I thought doing this would please everyone because it has long detailed reviews and short, somewhat humorous, mildly informative reviews for people who don't like to read so much. It's purpose was pretty much to try and make everyone happy. I failed.




The concept of jamming multiple reviews into one is alright, but could it have been for any other album?



Also, if you feel you're in a slump, try listening to new music.



edit: I like Neo but taking shots at other reviewers because you think they're not "respected" is downright immature.This Message Edited On 10.20.06

metallicaman8
October 20th 2006


4677 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

If people want to know what to expect exactly from each song, they'd just listen to the album, thus rendering blow-by-blow tbt's in full out of the water. Doing maybe one highlight in such a manner is a useful tool; doing an entire album is pointless.




Noted. No need for any further discussion of the tbt.

The Door Mouse
October 20th 2006


2092 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

ive been waiting for this. i didnt read the whole thing just the tbt and the trial but they were great. u said it wasnt gonna be mop. u tricked me! good job. congrats on 50

Neoteric
October 20th 2006


3243 Comments


Neoteric, I'm sorry to say this, but when it comes to intelligence and actual reviewing, I think Chan has you beat pretty easily.
Intelligence? Going around, slandering people's reviews and pretending to be all witty is intelligence to you?

And I know I'm not a good writer and I really am trying to improve so I don't need your opinion. Anyway, I'm staying out of this, I'm just going to get myself banned.

Also, who the hell are you anyway?

What the fuck does being a "veteran" have to do with anything? What, just because I don't go around bullshitting people like all of you, now all of a sudden I'm the worst user ever?
Bullsh[font=verdana]itting[/font] people? Hah.

edit: I like Neo but taking shots at other reviewers because you think they're not "respected" is downright immature.
Yeah, I'm sorry, it was. Chan just irritates me.This Message Edited On 10.20.06



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy