This isn't a very well written review mate. All I feel I've gotten from the review is that you find the album boring, wanky, and poor in the production department. All of which was expressed by the second para. If you haven't got much to say, write a sound-off. No need for excessive whining. The first para is unnecessary, the second para boils down to things being derivative, the third para is a lengthy production critique, and the fourth para is a re-run of the second.

Also, don't have "favorite/least favorite tracks" segments. If it wasn't important enough to feature your highlights and lowlights in the review, either leave those sentiments out entirely or reconsider how you tackle the album at hand.

I can't remember what this album sounded like as I haven't jammed it in a long time but it already has four pages of reviews so a frustrated, overly lengthy soundoff probably isn't needed.

Album Rating: 3.0

No holding back with the guy who rated ‘everything is fire’ a 1.5 over here

Album Rating: 2.0

His rating of Everything is Fire has nothing to do with how valid his criticism of this review is. Especially because he's not even arguing about the rating that the reviewer gave it.

Album Rating: 3.0

I didn’t say it was invalid or anything at all, I respect any criticism he has to offer, I was merely reminding him of the travesty I witnessed on the EIF thread

Album Rating: 2.0

That makes more sense. I was slightly confused as to what you were getting at for a bit there. haha