Royal Blood How Did We Get So Dark?
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
SteakByrnes
June 18th 2017


29888 Comments


Damn, you said you might do a 0.5 review and you actually did

Bravo my good man

hobblepot
June 18th 2017


2947 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

This album isn't really all that bad, to me it's a rehash of their debut, with slightly more polished production

butcherboy
June 18th 2017


9464 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

debut really wasn't anything to write home about either..

neekafat
Staff Reviewer
June 18th 2017


26247 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

"It's a terrible review"



At least he's humble

hogan900
June 18th 2017


3316 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

Agreed tbh

DoofusWainwright
June 18th 2017


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 0.5

Neeks, that was for my first attempt at reviewing the album.



This second attempt is merely moderately shitty

danielcardoso
June 18th 2017


11770 Comments


Merely lol.

DoofusWainwright
June 18th 2017


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 0.5

In defence of the 0.5 rating



The music on this album makes me feel like Frank when he collapses to the floor clutching his fake head after the ginger lad starts singing and playing the guitar. When asked what's wrong I'd simply reply 'the music is bad'



In further defence of the 0.5 rating



This is my least favourite album of 2017, it's to my ears the least inspired, most forgettable, most redundant record of the 200 or so I've spun. That warrants a 0.5 (bear in mind in reality half my 1 ratings should really be 0.5 ratings)



In further further defence of the 0.5 rating



I'm not blind hating the band, I have the debut at a 2 and played it 20 or so times when it came out. This band should be my sort of thing, at least a bit.

TheCrocodile
June 18th 2017


2925 Comments


I don't get how a Royal Blood album can be a 0.5... they just sound mediocre, but not offensively bad.

then again I didn't listen to this

DoofusWainwright
June 18th 2017


19991 Comments

Album Rating: 0.5

Well, the debut was only a 2 for me and this is significantly inferior

TVC15
June 18th 2017


11372 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Huh

tommygun
June 18th 2017


27109 Comments


how did we get so shite

neekafat
Staff Reviewer
June 18th 2017


26247 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

How could you bear to listen to a 2.0 album 20 times

AlexKzillion
June 19th 2017


17346 Comments


great review tbh

Jots
Emeritus
June 19th 2017


7562 Comments


if an album has an absence of good then IMO it starts at 0/5 and has to fight its way out of the hole. I have no quibble with 0.5 ratings tbh. ppl are just used to 0.5-1.5 reviews being over-the-top in how terms of heaping shit onto the album in question. do yo' thang

Asdfp277
June 19th 2017


24385 Comments


honestly who gives a shit what he rated it, just do a good review

Conmaniac
June 19th 2017


27694 Comments


ratings fail.

RogueNine
June 19th 2017


5559 Comments


Kerr was pretty slick on the first record, so I'm curious to find out if indeed he's slipped a lot.

Kalopsia
June 19th 2017


3384 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

0.5 harsh. this isn't as good as their first but it still has some jams.

klap
Emeritus
June 19th 2017


12409 Comments


always thought these guys were just DFA1979 ripoffs



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy