I guess on a song to song basis it is worse. But stylistically, the albums do not differ.

I bet this is awful, they can't take their sound that far

Oh yeah definitely.

Album Rating: 2.0

This does seem to lack the energy and weight of their last record. Pretty disappointed

faux rock for faux rockers

check the who

yes?

tommy can you hear me

I read an article in alternative nation that they could be the next nirvana. Not sure if I can't trust them.

i'm afraid they don't quite have the same songwriting abilities as young ol kurdt kobain, nor the array of brilliant influences to rip off. ah.

@KILL https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlXjIg4fH74

truly the worst band

tehehe

Album Rating: 3.0

This album is just their debut again

Album Rating: 2.0

Disagree tbh. The debut was good, this lacks most of what made it so for me

Album Rating: 2.0

Also, actually checked The Who on Kills advice, good shit

Lul no wonder kids think cock rock like Royal Blood is good. They never knew rock existed before the 90s.

Album Rating: 2.0

Lol cool generalisation mate

lol ghandi why you think i spam the who so much, kidz gota learn the classix

one of the biggest and most important bands in the world and only like 3 ppl jam em on here

but you rock hard for checkin asleep bro plz check quadrophenia it'll blow your dick

Album Rating: 3.5

B-sides are better than some tracks on the album.



Cheap Affection: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqhcpWKAW6g

Half the Chance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox6Mhl65kV8

Album Rating: 3.0

> B-Sides are better

[x2]