Metallica St. Anger
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Grimlin
March 1st 2017


1452 Comments


https://eagerfortruth.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/you-keep-using-that-word.jpg

EphemeralEternity
March 1st 2017


4937 Comments


plus the whole this is a big fat non sequitur , the 5 doesn't even make sense in the context of the review.
Now I'm wondering whether the jokes on me and this was a troll review.

Dedes
Contributing Reviewer
March 1st 2017


11989 Comments


I don't think meta reviews are actually as big as you think they are lol

Alouette
March 1st 2017


6 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

joke review or??!!

MO
March 1st 2017


24253 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

good review haha

EphemeralEternity
March 1st 2017


4937 Comments


maybe meta wasn't the right word, self-referential maybe? idfk but you know what I was getting at.
but yeah they're not very common , I've only seen a handful which reflect qualities from the music but somehow i don't think this is one of them.

rodrigo90
March 1st 2017


7387 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Who wants to write an amazing review for Lou Reed's metal machine music?

AsleepInTheBack
Emeritus
March 1st 2017


10746 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I mean I agree with the sentiment of the review, but you needn't make the argument that its 'classic' because its horrible. Infamously bad, sure, but nothing is 'classic' because its horrendous. A 1 will signify your sentiment well enough

rodrigo90
March 1st 2017


7387 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

No guitar solos, no drum technique, bad sound production, recycled chords for more than 1 song...Did I mention that the album suffers from loudness war if you turn the volume too high?

AlexKzillion
Emeritus
March 1st 2017


19079 Comments


Almost is an understatement

rodrigo90
March 1st 2017


7387 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

There you go

bloc
March 1st 2017


70880 Comments


I do see the argument made in the review and agree with it.

Sevengill
March 1st 2017


13180 Comments


So is Chocolate Starfish a 5 also

Zig
March 1st 2017


2772 Comments


"classic is defined by recognizable and established value." Bullshit!

Funny review.

wham49
March 1st 2017


6359 Comments


that is just coo coo talk 7,

if it is a true review give the dude a break, maybe he got what he was looking for, either way I have opinions that get slammed and people try to intimidate me when I say terrible horrible things like Offspring Smash is not a 5, and isnt really punk, so good for him if he thinks that way, at least he is thinking, and not going with the crowd

fullautorpg
March 1st 2017


113 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

So is Chocolate Starfish a 5 also

No, that one is and will always be a 1. Since Limp Bizkit never had any potential, they don't even have a fall from grace.

ZippaThaRippa
March 1st 2017


10674 Comments


If this was Metallica's only album, it would be their best album

Snide
March 1st 2017


7049 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

This is an interesting concept for a review, and I feel that while it was executed a little clumsily that it should remain on the site. I honestly would like to see more reviews like this for older albums in the future on the site.

ZippaThaRippa
March 1st 2017


10674 Comments


Shut the fuck up Sasuke

Snide
March 1st 2017


7049 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Shut up... you, you... blond, Jessica Nigri look-alike.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy