Album Rating: 4.0
any edits you would suggest? and yeah ded check this my man i'm sure you'd dig
|
| |
Yeah sure I'll throw some up inna bit, I'm almost home. Will download it too
|
| |
"I once wrote a song called “Bring the Noise” awhile back, right when I was first starting to get into writing lyrics and such."
there are three separated instances here that are spent identifying the time you wrote the song. you could rework it to say something like "Back when I was first starting to write my own lyrics, I came up with a song called 'Bring the Noise'", just more in your voice
"The idea behind the song was that it would be a noise rock inspired track with me muttering the words “bring the noise I am ready to learn” while the rest of the band broke out into a cacophony of, well, noise. "
here you repeat the word song for the last sentence and go on to say noise three times in the same sentence. you do sorta reference that at the end by saying "well, duh", but you could probably just say "The track would have had me muttering...of, well, noise" just to eliminate the 'song' and one of the 'noises'
"Despite what their name may suggest, the band themselves don’t partake in the activity associated with their own name. "
you say name twice. you could just say "Despite what their name may suggest, the band members don't partake in that recreation."
you repeat dreamy twice, you could just find a synonym, but this isn't too glaring and could be left as is.
"You could smoke to this album, but you would have to be prepared to not just sit back and relax as the album will throw you into its whirlwind of noise and emotion."
replace 'the album' with 'it', esp since the next paragraph starts with the same word.
those two paragraphs had the more obvious ones.
i encourage you to work my suggests in with your tone and distinct style because this review def reads like you wrote it, and thats a good thing! i just feel you let some redundancy slip through your proof reading
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Just listened to this, I enjoyed it, feels more like an EP than an album but that's a pretty minor issue.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
hey thanks for all the edits i'll try to get those in within the next day or two space!! redundancy is something i've noticed that I struggle with but it's hard for me to really notice unless people point it out so much appreciated
and yeah I agree a bit Boney even though it's 9 songs. what would ya rate it?
|
| |
i didnt think it was true until i jammed this
it gave me the confidence to like the 'I fucking love science' page on facebook and now i'm such a nerd XD
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Con it'll probably end up a 3.5, I'll see how I feel after another couple listens though. I had the volume a bit low on the first half or so, so I probably didn't get the full effect of the noise.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Weed is pretty tight
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
if the band name is turning you off, frontman Will Anderson said that he likes to see it as "weeding people out of your life" instead of the drug. also they don't even smoke haha
but nice Boney, def jam this at a high volume tho
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
also edited it thanks to TheWeedMan's suggestions (;
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Listened again. "Hollowed Out" is my favorite I think.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
obvious standout so nice man. the chorus is honestly perfect
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
This is def a tasty slice o' noise, thanks for repping it dude
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
is it on spotify or nah
|
| |
why didnt you review the good weed?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
dammitt kill
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
"is it on spotify or nah"
'tis
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
because this is the good weed KILL
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Your Right and Silent Partner are awesome
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Silent Partner kills ya
|
| |
|
|
