Album Rating: 4.0
I saw that on genius yeah, there's so many little interesting tidbits hidden in this album
|
| |
Good place to start for this group?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Absolutely
|
| |
Sweet, will check after work.
|
| |
"See you later...after work"
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
"Good place to start for this group?"
they literally have 2 albums. perhaps their debut is a 'good' place to start.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
And two EPs tbf
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
eps arent albums they are eps
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
album implies full length aka LP, nobody starts on someones eps unless they are retarded or its electronic artists who only have eps
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
but anyways it seems kind of goofy to me to listen to a bands new album first intentionally if they literally only have one album before it unless you are desperate to fill your 2016 queue like its not like you have this crazy amount of catching up to do where you actually have to analyze the best starting point to safely integrate you into the artists soundweb
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
like its cool to follow bands progressions if you can, so if you can you should.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
something something quadruple post
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
suck my sphincter rowan
|
| |
That's what I try to do, but sometimes I end up starting with a band's highest rated album.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
bewilderingly trivial elaboration post 7
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
"That's what I try to do, but sometimes I end up starting with a band's highest rated album."
yeah when they have like 7 albums, not when they have 2
***when they have like 7 albums, not when they have 2 ESPECIALLY if they are super modern
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
"Gotta fill that end of the year comment quota eh Pots? "
what
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
i dont think there was a way to say that right
|
| |
Like for example, Neurosis I started with their highest rated and then went through chronologically
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
no it makes sense its just retarded
|
| |
|
|
