^Another comment of the day from steerpike.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
... I cannot fathom how people can think how their review looks does not matter. Of
course it matters. If you want to be taken seriously and your review is all one paragraph
or contains run on sentances.
It does matter! If you review an album at least take the time to proof read what you've
written.
I've been thinking that maybe there needs to be a 'Read Me' on this site about how to
construct a good review.This Message Edited On 05.22.06
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
I actually like this band a lot, but this review did not do it for me. He rarely used good grammer. Could have been better...
|
| |
Seriously, Steerpike, fuck off. It was the dudes first review. Don't be such a patronizing bitch.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
thanks kripes, i mean come on do you really have to take everything so seriously round here no need to get personal with the grammar. nice little comment there. -_-
liven up its average album and i suppose i gave a average review maybe ill learn but not from someone taking the piss to be honest.
|
| |
Seriously, Steerpike, fuck off. It was the dudes first review. Don't be such a patronizing bitch.
A first try is not an excuse for deliberate laziness. He obviously took the time to write a track-by-track, so there was no reason for him not to take the time to make sure he could at least hit the "Shift" key at the right places.
I don't care if you're not getting paid to write these reviews. I don't care if you don't consider yourself a professional writer. That does not mean the internet is a raceway where you must sacrifice coherency, grammar, and spelling just so you can be first in line to make a comment about something.
If you mumble and ramble in real life, I'm not going to understand you. You're going to have to repeat yourself and speak clearly. Just because this is the internet does not mean that rule no longer applies.
thanks kripes, i mean come on do you really have to take everything so seriously round here no need to get personal with the grammar. nice little comment there. -_-
liven up its average album and i suppose i gave a average review maybe ill learn but not from someone taking the piss to be honest.
I hate to repeat myself but... If you cannot communicate in a clear, concise way, why should I or anyone else be bothered to decipher it?
And just because the album sucks doesn't mean you shouldn't take your time to make a coherent sentence.This Message Edited On 05.22.06
|
| |
I don't see what the big deal is in resulting for a 0/4 approval rating. For a first review this was fine.
My only recommendation to the review is to DEFINTATELY employ better grammar and spelling. Also strive for a little more indepth look on the album itself and possibly the history behind it.
|
| |
So fucking what, Steerpike? You tell the user to work better on their grammar next time around, not bash the hell out of them like you did, you prick.
[quote=]I don't care if you're not getting paid to write these reviews. I don't care if you don't consider yourself a professional writer. That does not mean the internet is a raceway where you must sacrifice coherency, grammar, and spelling just so you can be first in line to make a comment about something.[/quote]Cut my wrist and black my eyes so I can fall asleep tonight.
Really, lighten the hell up.This Message Edited On 05.22.06
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
steerpike get a life and stop roaming around trying to find fault in things if im so bad and really dont mean nothing to a person like you so high in calibur why are writing lengthy comments back your obviously gettin worked up up lol this will be my last to you your just not worth mine or anyones time to be perfectly honest.
=) (big smiling face)
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
It really wasn't the worst first review. There have been far worse attempts.
|
| |
I honestly don't think anything is really wrong with the review. Some of the seperate track descriptions were vague and the grammar was sloppy at points but you did just as good as I did on my first review.
|
| |
This album is balls. I liked the first single, but honestly...
"This music is going to blow people's minds. Angels and Airwaves will be the best thing that ever happened to music" - Tom DeLonge
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
thanks a straightforward 2/5 for my review i meen ive rather have that than someone just rambling on and being degrading
|
| |
The sad thing is he really said that. :-|
[quote=Zebra]I honestly don't think anything is really wrong with the review. Some of the seperate track descriptions were vague and the grammar was sloppy at points but you did just as good as I did on my first review. [/quote]Exactly, but I'm sure Steerpike will come back with three annoying paragraphs on how his way is the right way, just like on the City of Evil review.
|
| |
So fucking what, Steerpike? You tell the user to work better on their grammar next time around, not bash the hell out of them like you did, you prick.
So you didn't catch the "Fix your grammar" subtext in all of my posts, then? I need to start being more heavy-handed.
I'm sure the reviewer is crying himself to sleep right now. Oh wait...
steerpike get a life and stop roaming around trying to find fault in things if im so bad and really dont mean nothing to a person like you so high in calibur why are writing lengthy comments back your obviously gettin worked up up lol this will be my last to you your just not worth mine or anyones time to be perfectly honest.
So you want a perfect, happy community of sunshine, puppies, and singing flowers where no one ever disagrees on anything?
It's not your review itself I take issue with. You obviously can write. What I take issue with is the fact that people for some reason seem to think that because this is the internet, they don't have to obey even the most basic rules of grammar and spelling. It's incredibly difficult to read, and it's downright rude to everyone else.
I admit, I'm an egotistical prick and I think two-thirds of the people on this site are morons. But if you're going to say something, at least make it legible. Take issue with my methods all you want. Like everyone, you have every right to be offended by my loud, arrogant swaggering.
But don't act as if I don't have a legitimate point to make. Just learn to use correct punctuation and capitalization and I'll shut the hell up.
Exactly, but I'm sure Steerpike will come back with three annoying paragraphs on how his way is the right way, just like on the City of Evil review.
I'd apologize for inconveniencing you, but I'd be lying.This Message Edited On 05.22.06
|
| |
Uh, yeah, I'm done defending jt-ocdp after I just read the new Hawthorne Heights blurb.
|
| |
Steerpike, it was the manner you went about telling the guy to fix his grammar.
|
| |
Steerpike, it was the manner you went about telling the guy to fix his grammar.
Complain about my methods all you want. Be as offended as you want to be. I still expressed my point, and let's face it, it was pretty effective in that you people actually listened and reacted.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
ha i said i wouldnt comment back but i feel the need to lol its quite funny you really got some built up anger in there man about bad reviews and grammar.
count the punctuation used in that little short paragraph or is it a paragraph?
you'd probably be a better teacher than my english tutor at school man.
|
| |
Well that's the totally wrong way to look at it. We reacted because your being a douche.
|
| |
|
|
