Album Rating: 3.5
Gotcha e21, and you're welcome. These corrections I gave you, are a way to positively criticize your review in order to help you improving your writing. And after all, that's what you're asking for; some positive criticism, and you got it in my own way ;)
Also, have you re-listened to the keyboard segment of Mr Pine (2:07) vs the keyboard segment of Running Hard (5:14)?
By the way, Mr. Pine was penned by Michael Dunford, so no surprising that Renaissance borrowed a Mr Pine's passage and put it into a subsequent song.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Is this worth checking?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Yes, you're right dude. It needs no introduction. However, as you have not rated it, yet!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
yeah Gentleman. Listen to Golden Thread and Face of Yesterday.
|
| |
I always see these around but never picked one up, this has changed my mind, I'm sure I'll never see it now that I am interested however.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
You haven't checked the essential albums by Renaissance wham? they're like, huh, ESSENTIAL!
|
| |
I see them but was unsure about what they were like, It didn't pass my unknown band coolness factor test, but now that I know, I'm on board
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
If you'd like to start with the band their first albums are definitely not a good starting point, you gotta check Ashes are Burning, Turn of the Cards and Song of Scheherazade, perfect mix of prog and classical music, plus best bass ever
|
| |
Cool, I'll look for some, The name put me off, couldn't tell if they were neo-psych, which I don't really like, bu the time period is great, thanks for the heads up.
We get along so much better when not talking BS!
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Meh, I see the problems we get on BS threads as simple music debates which I love, so don't worry haha
|
| |
no worries here, it will continue, nice arguing with people who no music
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
wham dude ashes and scheherazade will change your life
|
| |
I know, I'm on it, I pride myself in having all the early 70's obscure stuff,
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
And don't forget to check also Prologue and Novella. Both are also great albums, soon after the other three already mentioned.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
That's funny, I listened to both these albums today. I prefer Prologue over Novella. I have to listen to the latter once more though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I no longer listen these albums for a while. I think you're right. Prologue is probably better than Novella. However, I think both are very similar in terms of quality.
|
| |
I've been digging the more renowned part of the band's discogs for quite some time, and I absolutely love it, but I've heard their first two records are a bit different. Are they worth listening too? Judging on your ratings I assume they probably are, but still..
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Their very first is better than ''Illusion''. The s/t is a folk rock album with a good load of classical piano. Album is more consistant than Illusion'', another folk album from witch the production was broken because of a switch in the personnel, so the rest of the band showed some difficulties to glue the whole thing together. Try ''Golden Thread'' and ''Face of Yesterday'' though.
|
| |
Here comes an 8 year bump, brace yourselves.
This is nice, it has some really good moments and other times it's just confusing. Review is on point, e2, great job as always.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Thanks Dewinged.
|
| |
|
|
