Seether Disclaimer II
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Shadows
Moderator
July 4th 2004


2530 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

I apologize for sullying your thread with those last two posts of mine. You'll make a fine reviewer.


Woah, thanks a lot!



As for the guy who called me biased - if being a fan of the band I reviewed is considered biased, then how could any cd review on MX be worth anything?

Shadows
Moderator
July 5th 2004


2530 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

please don't flame me, but what exactly is "pwned"? i see it used often and get completely lost when i see it...

YDload
July 5th 2004


1207 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

"pwned" is an intentional mispelling of "owned," which is when a person is flamed to the point that they have no comeback, or if they have made a mistake that someone else points out. It's also called "getting served."

Shadows
Moderator
July 6th 2004


2530 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Thanks. So when he said 'pwned'...and I got 'pwned'... It all makes sense now.

I'm also really glad the mood of this thread has lightened, since people have stopped flaming and spamming. Let's all just get along.

Anybody for a group hug? :rolleyes:

Mozzletoffed
July 24th 2004


54 Comments


Seether is my favorite band. I love all there songs, scratch the new broken, they had to go and put her in it and made an electric solo....ahh!

Shadows
Moderator
July 24th 2004


2530 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

They would've done better to make an album of George Bush impressions then to do a song with her. Broken is killing the band.

Vlad_The_Moose
August 16th 2004


14 Comments


Hey, great review

I loved their first single - Fine Again; great tune overall.. I have to say i've never been a huge fan of the grunge movement, but i really liked that tune.
The tune with the Evaschenecse chick is pure mainstream, so i'd rather skip it,even though it seems that's their big break

And i think the solo in broken is the only good thing bout it (that's 1/5 instead of 0/5

CrookedFingers
August 16th 2004


7 Comments


Beh, Seether's not my cup of tea... Amy Lee is hot...

d0ped0g
August 17th 2004


10 Comments


[QUOTE=Death to Pop-Punk]
Driven Under - 4/5
I once heard someone (not sure who) say that this was a piece of lyrical garbage. How wrong he/she was. The lyrics are moving and deal strongly with one's problems with a loved one. This song did terrible as the band's second single, a fact which pains me every time I mention it. Although musically it is by far the easiest song to play on the album, the sadness it instills hits me everytime I listen.
[/QUOTE]

it was me who said it was a peice of lyrical garbage

at the risk of sounding unintellegent and my opinion seeming unfounded... i refuse to justify it

scrowler
November 20th 2004


15 Comments


seether are great, although i am sick of the censoring in kazaa etc when i try to preview some of their songs, so im going to buy this album in the near future

mudvayne_bass_player
June 22nd 2005


71 Comments


I bought Disclaimer 2 when I had only heard Broken with Amy Lee. (Man she is so HOT!!!!!!!!!!!) I would give it somewhere between 3.5 and 4.This Message Edited On 07.10.05

Catmeat
July 30th 2005


39 Comments


1 amy lee is a whore

2 great review

3 dumb album
ah ah thats funny

4 my life is boring


Storm In A Teacup
October 20th 2005


47081 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Amy Lee is hot...






ew ugh ew haahh!



I bought this version and had it for a few months, but got tired of it and just sold it.





Shattered_Future
October 20th 2005


1641 Comments


I have the ORIGINAL of this album...stupid rereleased album. Didn't buy it...didn't feel like spending money on 8 new tracks when the original album wasn't up to par as was.

This isn't as bad as some make out to be. About half the tracks are decent, and half could be considered filler.



Shadows
Moderator
October 20th 2005


2530 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Woah, this is a seriously old review. My first I believe.



I still like Seether, but my opinion on them (especially this album) has definitely changed. This this review was horribly biased. I should re-write it, but I have so many other reviews to redo that I don't know if I'll ever get to this.

Shadows
Moderator
December 8th 2005


2530 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Like I said, this was my first review, well over a year ago. I definitely don't feel the same way about this anymore. I edited the rating but never changed any content to match it. I've been contemplating having this deleted as it's easily my worst review. The 2.5 I changed it to is still very generous.

Vigilantex13xgod
December 8th 2005


5 Comments


first of all, how can only 2 songs be below about a 2/5, but you give the album a 2.5/5. Second of all, "f*** it" was one of the worst songs I have ever heard. It was a simple excuse to be vulgar. to be fair though, you did provide some interesting facts about some of these songs so even though i didn't like some of what you said, i was able to read the whole thing without wanting to shoot myself

I'm going to see if it will let me post my review of this album and we will see.



Shadows
Moderator
December 8th 2005


2530 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Way to read what I just posted jackass.

Vigilantex13xgod
December 8th 2005


5 Comments


don't give me that bullshit man im just stating my opinion

Shadows
Moderator
December 8th 2005


2530 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

You didn't have to state it a second time, after I explained it all in the post before that.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy