Hark Crystalline
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
TheBarber
March 16th 2014


4130 Comments


Sput needs more sludge love! the track you linked is pretty badass (artwork too) soo I'll def dig into this

greg84
Emeritus
March 16th 2014


7654 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

I agree. What happened to your previous account, man?

TheBarber
March 16th 2014


4130 Comments


Permabanned and never knew why (wasn't even in the banned thread), I hate dealing with those kinds of profile problems and had stopped rating albums at the same time so I just made a new profile from scratch

TheBarber
March 16th 2014


4130 Comments


Doesn't bother me and I prefer this username to the other one (The Barber being my fav Cohen Brothers flick), anyway back to the music as always and this is booming!

JS19
March 17th 2014


7777 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Does this just sound like Intronaut?

TheBarber
March 17th 2014


4130 Comments


It's got very very few nods to the prog parts of intronaut but in terms of actual sound it's closer to
Old Man Gloom without the ambient elements

Spokklett
March 17th 2014


125 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

It doesn't really sound like Intronaut at all.



Really enjoying this actually, quite impressed with their sound & song writing. Some seriously ballsy jams as well as more groovy and chill sections.

decoyoctopus
March 17th 2014


160 Comments


When I saw review mention progressive sludge I sorta got excited for something sounding like Mastodon or Baroness, but this has absolutely no similarities to those bands in the least.

Although I am about 4 tracks in now and I am starting to enjoy it more as it goes.
I think vocals are what I am struggling most to enjoy from this band atm.

TheBarber
March 17th 2014


4130 Comments


takes multiple listens for sure, vox are alright but defenitly not the highlight

Funeralopolis
March 17th 2014


14586 Comments


Vocals do suck yea

greg84
Emeritus
March 17th 2014


7654 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

I for one dig the vocals. I think they fit the music really well. It still depends on what you expect, though.

decoyoctopus
March 17th 2014


160 Comments


See I feel like these vocals would much better fit a thrash or metalcore band, they feel a little bit underwhelming when stacked against the scale of the instrumentation employed on this thing.

greg84
Emeritus
March 17th 2014


7654 Comments

Album Rating: 3.8

That's a fair point, but I wouldn't like to have terribly melodic vocals on this. This is still stoner/sludge metal.

decoyoctopus
March 17th 2014


160 Comments


Not even necessarily melodic.
There's been one other really good stoner/sludge metal act besides this one that caught my attention so far this year, and it was Ethereal Riffian's 'Aeonian'. Those vocals were more akin to lo-fi monk chant. I can't help but feel that the style of vocals used on this aren't the best match for the music - but I am going to give this a few more fair listens because I definitely enjoy it and I think I will enjoy it more and more each time.

Funeralopolis
March 17th 2014


14586 Comments


Yea I feel not necessarily that the vocals themselves are bad but they don't complement the music well

facupm
March 18th 2014


11870 Comments


sounds sweet

Dr7
March 18th 2014


193 Comments


Some pretty wicked riffage going on here. Like it a lot.

Violinist
March 18th 2014


28 Comments


Good stuff, just wish the production was better. Maybe intentional, but the mix is pretty rough.

Pankar95
March 19th 2014


175 Comments


Is the artwork by the Baroness guy?

TheBarber
March 19th 2014


4130 Comments


nope it's by Jimbob Isaac (bestest last name)



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy