Album Rating: 3.5

Dude I think I did though! Jom joked around with me and said he can't possibly promote someone who can't read(meaning I misunderstood a question in the apps) and said he's punishing me lol so we'll see about the next round of promotions which should be soon :D

No, remember, he said a unit of time relating to "4." It could be 4 years, 4 months, 4 weeks, hell it could even be 4 hours from now. Who knows, haha

It's scary to see you as staff as well 0.o

Album Rating: 3.5

Haha yea dude. I emailed him. All that matters is he was prob hinting that I got it. Sure seems like it. If not, oh well. Next time!

Hey man! This isn't a bad review, but there are a couple things that are holding it back significantly in my eyes. First off, it feels rather disjointed- take a look at the first paragraph, for instance, and note how the main point you're drilling home tends to change from one sentence to the next. Aim for asserting statements on the listener, and then following those up with explanations / justifications. This will not only make the review more readable; it'll make your points hit home much more strongly.

Also, one thing to consider is that this review strikes on the same points multiple times. like the fact that this record is disjointed. I mean this with the best of intentions, but it strikes me as one of those "so what?" points about an album. Music can be disjointed, and still work- when I read this review, I don't exactly understand what it is that doesn't work for you. Is it that the style of music here would be better suited for more cohesiveness? If so, why? These are all important things to think about.

My main point would be to dig deeper in reviews. This has a fair bit of surface-level analyses, like what songs sound like what or which ones are disjointed- but I'd like to see something a bit more thoughtful in future write-ups. Be more descriptive- tell us what kind of music this is, and why it may be worth paying attention to- but then take the reader beyond that description and explain what it is that interests you. Because let's face it: if you're writing this review, you found something in this music that made you want to share your thoughts with us about it.

Album Rating: 3.5

Forget about asking you to read this haha



Thanks man yea I guess the point I was trying to make was that this style is better suited for a cohesive record. And it's a plethora of styles like electronic music, ambient, jazz, experimental. I'll about those points next time definitely.

Album Rating: 4.0

S'good

Album Rating: 3.5

Yea this is pretty sweet. It just feels like a a plethora of too many styles and a collection of demos but most of the songs are great.