Green Day iTRE!
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Kman418
February 9th 2013


13271 Comments


No, if they had the same energy that they used to have then I'd be totally fine with listening to "old people music". But they don't. And chances are they never will again considering the way their last 4 releases ended up.

Kman418
February 9th 2013


13271 Comments


Nice edit btw

Asdfp277
February 9th 2013


25665 Comments


Are they seriously that languish now? It doesn't seem like it to me.

Oh, and with edit I didn't change anything relevant, get more butthurt.

Kman418
February 9th 2013


13271 Comments


...Yeah they really are. Is the amount of shit this album gets not enough to prove that to you? Or, again, their last 4 albums for that matter. Green Day's style relies on energy for it to be good. They've never been amazing song writers, but their music was energetic which made it fun to listen to. Over the years they've lost a lot of that energy, which again, isn't that unexpected considering their age. If they had changed their style and stopped relying on that energy that they no longer had, they could still be putting out good material.

Asdfp277
February 9th 2013


25665 Comments


So they have been too old for music since they were 28?

Kman418
February 9th 2013


13271 Comments


Actually considering Uno, Dos, Tre, and 21st Century Break Down were their last 4 albums and that last one only came out in 2009 that only makes them all 36, so I have no idea where you got that number from but w/e

Unless for some reason you'd want to consider Uno Dos and Tre one album which would just be silly. Either way those were the ones I was talking about, sorry if there was any miscommunication.

Kman418
February 9th 2013


13271 Comments


On top of that I guess saying they were too old for music was the wrong choice of words, they're too old for this type or music. Or rather they no longer have the energy for this type of music which is most likely due to their age.

Asdfp277
February 9th 2013


25665 Comments


Ok. Still, their age has nothing to do with the music; it's their problem if they are boring.

EDIT: Not really. They could all have 60 for all I care; as long as they make catchy, energetic pop
punk (not my thing, but whatever)...

Gwyn.
February 9th 2013


17270 Comments


"demi: 15. each album has 5 reviews."

Actually no, I think you forgot that now the reviews are put in pages

the hole trilogy has over 30 reviews

lz41
February 9th 2013


252 Comments


This carcass has been picked clean


DrGonzo1937
Staff Reviewer
February 9th 2013


18924 Comments


Another review for an album that doesn't need it. Shit album. Shit trilogy. Nuff said.

lyzakthellama
February 9th 2013


2118 Comments


Lol Blink changed their "style" with their age and people still hate their new stuff.

CamGrovesfan
March 23rd 2013


167 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Negative

Insurrection
March 23rd 2013


24856 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

jesus that album cover never fails to give me nightmares

CamGrovesfan
March 25th 2013


167 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

NEITHER DOES YOUR FACE HAHA



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy