Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
hmm after a couple listens, I'm inclined to agree with this rating. It's a really cool album, and musically it has a lot going for it, but a lot of it is really really really cheesy, especially in the vocal department. Maybe this just isn't my thing, or maybe I need some LSD idk. For now I'm going to give this a 3. I like it and will probably re-visit it so my rating might come up later. Maybe I just don't get it or something.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Yeh you just don't get it.
To be honest, I toyed with the idea that maybe I was just being hit by the initial "wow" factor before I wrote my review, but I'm still listening to it now. It certainly takes getting used to though, you can't expect everyone to like it immediately if they don't have the right mindset for it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
I was being totally sarcastic with the "I don't get it comment" but sure. There's something about the album that will keep me coming back but whether I grow to like it more remains to be seen.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I know. I had to rant about something other than the "cheesy" bit, that would've taken too long.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
someone's in a condescending mood. people have differing opinions sometimes you know.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
there's honestly nothing really even wow about this other than the fact that it's really original but it's just so ridiculous and i just can't take it seriously. try mr. bungle or something if you want ridiculous in a good way
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
People are also allowed to dispute.
"there's honestly nothing really even wow about this other than the fact that it's really original but it's just so ridiculous and i just can't take it seriously."
Yeh nothing wow about it apart from its originality, production, variety, ambition or how it just likes to explode. Accept that it's going to be bizarre, taking it seriously is no harder than enjoying it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
yes people are allowed to dispute, you're just being condescending: "I had to rant about something other than the "cheesy" bit, that would've taken too long."
whatever though. sup sam, nice rating. I'm not a huge Mr. Bungle fan either.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Yeh nothing wow about it apart from its originality, production, variety, ambition or how it just likes to explode. Accept that it's going to be bizarre, taking it seriously is no harder than enjoying it.
im sorry but production never really "wows" me if something has great production which this does then it's great but im not gonna be like omg production
as far as variety, i think that can go some ways. i think something can be extremely varied in tone, atmosphere, and overall songwriting (ok computer for a generic example) yet feel like a cohesive statement. this does not, this feels indulgent to the point of being a turn off.
ambition-wise, this is a great example of something being ambitious to a fault. the music just does not bear the incredible weight bestowed upon its concept im sorry there's just no real full connection with this and its concept. there's no real full connection with this at all
not trying to argue just talkin man
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
It's cool, I can deal with talking.
And Aids, I really, really hate the use of cheesy to describe things like this. It's just... bleckh *steam rises from ears*. So don't mistake that for me being a huge asshole. I'm just a regular one.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
what word would you prefer me to use? a lot of the vocals on this album are really really cheesy, it's the only word that fits sorry.
over-the-top, sounds like a retarded goat, cheesy. same thing.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
idk, dated? A word that doesn't carry the same sub-level connotations.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
lowered it a tad
it has less staying power than i would have hoped
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
"idk, dated? A word that doesn't carry the same sub-level connotations. "
....but the reason I picked the word "dated" is precisely because it carries those sub-level connotations; I wanted to say something negative about it.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
never said anything about vocals being cheesy but who cares what the band name is i could name my band poopfaggot and still have serious, awesome vocals i mean wtf are u talking about even
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
wow.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
i don't see anything wrong with the vocals here
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Nothing on this album is cheesy. If anything, it's camp. There's a big difference between a romantic comedy and a cult classic.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
true, but this doesn't keep my attention at all save my flaming thirst. prod is srsly solid as hell tho
|
| |
|
|
