Album Rating: 2.5

have you ever noticed all of the HIM fanboys are about twelve years old?

Album Rating: 3.0

[quote=Idiot America]have you ever noticed all of the HIM fanboys are about twelve years old?[/quote]



That's one of the truest statements I've ever read actually.

i thought it was awful gosh HIM is awesome all of their songs are total awesomeness all you peeps who think that quite a few of their songs suk well so do you and bam is awesome i am absoutely glad he helps them thats a good thing

Album Rating: 1.5

[quote=sk8eraldatime]all you peeps who think that quite a few of their songs suk well so do you[/quote]



Whoa, you got me there. Please don't hurt my feelings so much in the future.

Scruples, you beat me to it....:upset:

n00b happens...

Album Rating: 1.0

Cat Stevens is a HIM ripoff



oh yeah I heard this last week, what a turdbagThis Message Edited On 12.06.05

Cats Stevens has been around looooooooooooong before HIM.

sk8teraldatime also hates everything now because his parents grounded him and took his ipod away from him

*sigh* stick to the review, we don't want anyone to be bashing now, do we?

:smash:
HIM (kidding)This Message Edited On 12.07.05

^^ That one's funny

me, sj, or both?

HIM bashing.

Although I do not agree with some of the ratings on the site (most reviews are just people flamming a band), some people do pull off good points. But albums should be reated to a reasonable standard, not "Oh, I hate this band, ONE!"

There are othe rpeople that look at Sputnik that are not members of it, wheither it's a majority opinion or not, reviews should be factual, not opinionanted.

i did try to not be overopinionated. not sure if it showed though

I think opinions should stay in the comments and the facts in the review.

well, it can get hard but we , as a community, do try

I just get mad with the 1 rating reviews scathing bands that don't dereve an awful, caus ethat's noty fact, or 1.5 for that matter. Unless there is a very good, strong reason for why an album should be a 2, no rating should be under a 2.5 for the most part.

Album Rating: 1.5

You think we give albums shitty ratings because it's fun?

Album Rating: 2.5

What the hell do you mean by "reviews should be factual, not opinionanted"? The entire point of the review is to write about your opinion and why you feel that way. If anything, the review should be opinion and facts left as a footnote.

Album Rating: 1.0

It isn't a fact when someone says an album sucks or rocks in a review, it's an opinion.