Panic! at the Disco A Fever You Can't Sweat Out
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
fenderstratocaster22
June 12th 2006


10 Comments


fanboy alert

burton.and.gas
June 26th 2006


641 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

A truly awful album really. but iguess that my opinion. i'm with the guy who gave it 1

Psyclone
October 19th 2006


432 Comments


Not a very good review in my opinion. Very fanboyish. You rated over 50% of the songs a five out of five, and that just doesn't work. At least your format is good, and there aren't any grammatical errors or spelling mistakes.

AnyColour74
October 19th 2006


1054 Comments


i just cant get into these guys. to popish for my likingThis Message Edited On 10.19.06

SexyKewl
October 19th 2006


17 Comments


The Beatles are pop yer know.

AnyColour74
October 19th 2006


1054 Comments


yeah yeah yeah but that pop is good

SexyKewl
October 19th 2006


17 Comments


Oh, okay.

I bet if Panic! was from the sixties you'd worship them.

Wildcatforever
October 19th 2006


441 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

But that isn't a good point because the fact is AnyColour74 doesn't like them now, so why would he like them if they were from the sixties? The production on the songs would be a lot worst, and this band probably wouldn't even exist due to a mediocre live performance.



But the album is solid, there isn't really a bad track on it.



SexyKewl
October 19th 2006


17 Comments


I was implying that there are numerous other facets that determine whether or not AnyColour likes a band or not. If Panic! were seen by the majority as retro and hip instead of lame pop-punk like most tend to think then I don't think he'd have any problem liking them. Or course, this is an assumption based solely on what I've witnessed thus far.

And as for mediocre live performances, what makes you say the 60's were a time of all-around star-studded libe performers?

hummer
October 19th 2006


228 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Hendrix, The Who, Zeppelin(69 at least), The Doors, Cream, I personally would give my left nut to see any of these bands live, all from the 60s, just from word of mouth and dvd clips.



On the other hand, after seeing Panic play the vmas, I would avoid them like the plague. Or at least i wish I would've when I saw them at summerfest. I felt like running up to the stage and punching the lead singer for how bad they butchered "tonight tonight."



They're not bad, just nothing special, and not good live (unless what I witnessed was a freak occurence.



And the reason all those 60s bands are so loved are cause of boundless originality and timeless songs. If you gave Fallout Boy or the Academy is a harp, piano, or synthesizer they'd sound the same as Panic!

MrKite
October 19th 2006


5020 Comments


Do you mean Tonight Tonight by Smashing Pumpkins, if so i dont find it surprising they wouldn't dfo a good job at it.

RottedFlesh
October 19th 2006


213 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Lol...nobody can cover the pumpkins correctly no matter how hard they tried imo...

RottedFlesh
October 19th 2006


213 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

They're live performances weren't about showiness, energy, and bravado. It was just about the music...

Pyramidman
October 20th 2006


1340 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

^^which had changed



i actually really liked Panics live shows



though i didnt see them cover Tonight Tonight



hummer
October 21st 2006


228 Comments

Album Rating: 1.0

Yeah it was the pumpkins song.



They also had their own rendition of karma police, not horrible, but very meh.



I once again don't mind this band, but the thought of them trying to cover the bohemian rhapsody frightens me. I have a feeling that the lead singer's gonna rupture his throat trying to sound like Freddie. Or just give up and cry...

TimJim
October 21st 2006


145 Comments


while his vocal range and sound is amazing, i dont appreciate all the GD's in this album

this band is a 1.5/5,and hawthorne heights is much better

Acey
October 21st 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

no, theyre not.

Acey
October 21st 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

this band is much more original by all means, and some of these songs are at least catchy

TimJim
October 21st 2006


145 Comments


um yeah, they are
This Message Edited On 10.21.06

Acey
October 21st 2006


2578 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

prove it



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy