totally not true irving

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

ILU SOWING.



Can the three of us win Sputnik's Best Love Triangle this year? =D

Sputnik 3some

I'm excited for Channing's Sputnik Madness in march. Hopefully he'll still do it now that he's emeritus, but I think this year I'd actually be in it (unlike last year when I was the sputnik social equivalent of the smelly kid who sits alone at the lunch table doing his chemistry homework)

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Can we be called XovingSeason?

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Wait wait wait. What's Channing's Sputnik Madness? Someone explain how the world works to the greenhorn!

Personally I like Sowvingphanes

And its just a bracket he'd do each year with users instead of college basketball teams. I don't think voting was ever even finished on 2010's lol

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

SOWVINGPHANES. I LOIKE.



The campaign trail starts NOW.



And I'm disappointed in myself for not knowing how college basketball team bracketing words. A Malaysian lost in a sea of Americanisms.

there's 64 teams separated into four brackets, each one with teams ranked 1-16. Then everyone just dukes it out until 1 team is left standing.

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

OMG!!! OMG that sounds PHENOMENAL!!!!



Can you remember any past winners?!

Chan usually won, or he won once for sure that's all i remember...last year i remember seaanemone got really far and chan was still alive by the final 8 or 4 or something but i forget what happened then

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Here's hoping he brings it back!



And now that I've lured you here under pretenses of love and a threesome, what do you think of the review? Comments? Criticisms?



=p

oh this is one of your reviews?

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

RECAP:



Irving: ILU XENO. You're the only one who visits when I bump my reviews!



Sowing: totally not true irving



*heartbroken*



And where the hell is Cheno anyway?

awful, awful review man.

jk pos'd. This is what I've come to expect of you man, great writing with tons of personality, descriptive language, and concise explanations. Keep up with the new releases and you'll be contrib eventually. Just my opinion.

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Nah, I'm not sure about that man. And here's why: comparing my work to people like say, yours or Dev's or Eric's, I find that I'm either a.) not as intelligent-sounding (probably because I actually am not very smart LOL) or b.) not as comfortable in explaining myself. I keep getting the sense that my writings sound forced and not as...natural.



Oh well. I love just being on here anyway. Anything else will be a bonus; it would be very nice to make Contrib, sure - but still a bonus.

Not that you should force the issue, I mean I really pushed the envelope with like 7 reviews a week back when I was making a mad dash for contrib...I think the last wave of hiring proved its not about how much you review. I'm just saying, have more confidence in yourself...your reviews don't sound forced at all IMO and you get better and better every time.

Album Rating: 3.5 | Sound Off

Good point SS. Ok, final question, and then I'll leave you two alone =p



Is there a distinct disparity between the quality of my positive and negative reviews?



Thanks SS + Xeno. You guys are awesome =)

I haven't seen too many negative reviews from you, but just based off memory I'd say your negative ones are more humorous, while your positive ones are more focused. Both types are well written though.

I would love to see you write a negative review contradicting something that is really well liked. I wouldn't want to see you do it just for the sake of doing it though, wait until you find something you feel strongly enough about to argue against with a passion. I think it would really help your ability to formulate/defend points. Not that you canlt do that already, but it would probably turn some heads.

Really enjoying your stuff. This is probably the best I've read of yours. Pos'd.