Simon and Garfunkel Greatest Hits
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
xfearbefore
November 16th 2010


2057 Comments


Not sure how this could be anything but a 5 considering the songs on this. Oh well, great review regardless.

Nagrarok
November 16th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Because I could never justify a classic rating for a compilation.

xfearbefore
November 16th 2010


2057 Comments


Really? That's odd. If anything a compilation album is easier to give a classic rating to I'd think, since it usually collects the very best work from an artist.

omnipanzer
November 16th 2010


21827 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

@Nagrarok

agreed

Nagrarok
November 16th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

If you use that logic, you could give so many compilations a 5. It would be way too easy. And whenever we talk about a 'classic' album, do we ever mean a best of/greatest hits? No, the term has always been used for studio records.



But then again, it's just my personal strictness on the rule.

Jethro42
November 16th 2010


18287 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

There's nothing like a classic LP

edit: I agree with your reasoning Nag. We posted at the same time

=]

Nagrarok
November 16th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Jethro knows what I mean. It's pretty much generally accepted that we don't call compilations classics. They're judged on how valuable they are in creating a representative/thorough overview of the artist.

starry
November 16th 2010


552 Comments


I prefer to make my own compilations of stuff than to depend on other people picking the best tracks, and it's quite easy to do that nowadays of course.

Nagrarok
November 16th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Of course, that's not the point of this discussion though.

Jethro42
November 16th 2010


18287 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

A classic album is an entire masterpiece of work done by an artist in a given time rather than an entire career's best stuff.



starry
November 16th 2010


552 Comments


It's an extension of the discussion. Certainly not irrelevant to the discussing of the worth of a compilation.


And on the latest point:
The thing about an album being written all at the same time of course is that there is a unity to it.

Jethro42
November 16th 2010


18287 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

VoilĂ .

BigHans
November 16th 2010


30959 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

to quote myself, fuck it, this is a 5.

Jethro42
November 16th 2010


18287 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I can't disagree with it, Hans.

Jethro42
November 16th 2010


18287 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Ok. Here is a judicious compromise: 4.5/4.5 for a flawless compilation.



omnipanzer
November 16th 2010


21827 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Lol

I agree with nagrarok and Jethro entirely but...

Then I'm reminded of Bread "Anthology" hmmmm

I guess I can also say: "4.5/4.5 for a flawless compilation."

Gyromania
Contributing Reviewer
November 17th 2010


38334 Comments


Man, you're pumping these reviews out faster than I can read 'em. Great job, as per usual.

AtavanHalen
November 17th 2010


17919 Comments


God that moustache is on another fucking level. Amazeface.

LetoAtreides
November 17th 2010


314 Comments


Great review. This compilation slays.

Also, Scarborough Fair/Canticle needs some love in this thread.

Nagrarok
November 17th 2010


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

Comments much appreciated everyone. And yes indeed, Scarborough Fair is where it's at.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy