i'd rather not listen to them at all, i prefer good music
|
| |
If you don't have a soft spot for their first two albums, you're lying to yourself.
|
| |
are you kidding me?
i've never liked this band
|
| |
Then you don't have a heart
|
| |
because i dont like awful music
|
| |
Ooooooo, you're so elite!
|
| |
do you even think before you post
|
| |
Not really, I go in and out.
|
| |
How can you say you don't listen to awful music when you have Animal Collective at a 4.5?
|
| |
oh ok
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
please people can we get back to the general impressions on the review ??? It's my first review and I would appreciate constructive criticism ^^
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.6
There's just a lot to be critical of... I think that's the problem. Whenever possible you should try to avoid using words like "I" or "me" and similar variations unless there's no way around it. Also don't try to hold a conversation through your review (It’s a concept album about a nuclear apocalypse and war; very cliché you might tell me, but do you prefer Chester singing stuff like...). There are people that can get those types of things to work, but it requires a bit more writing ability/experience.
The general impressions area is lacking some detail. You make statements such as "Joe Hahn has really outdone himself this time," and don't elaborate. How has he outdone himself? What the hell does he even do in the band? Seriously, I like these guys but I don't know their names or what they do.
The Good Points/Bad Points sections take too much priority on the review. If you want to include bullet points to sum up your review, it should be a minimal section at the end, not the majority of the write-up. Those sections would have been better if they were converted into paragraphs.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Thanks for the tips I'll try better next time (and Joe is the DJ of the band)
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
"What the fuck is this? Linkin Park hasn't grown at all. Nu-metal became unpopular so they crafted their style to better appeal to the mainstream audience.
Also, everyone would prefer juvenile, angry Linkin Park to sappy, electronic LP."
You´re contradicting yourself there.
Maybe they should have followed Papa Roach into delivering the same crap over and over again.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.0
your review isn't half bad...i'm just glad you didn't do a track by track.
i havent heard this yet but i doubt it will be higher than a 2.5, just based on what i think it will be
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
i'm just glad you didn't do a track by track
didn't want to piss people off lol
|
| |
review was okay.
the "we don't need chester turning into the lead singer of Avenged Sevenfold" thing was pretty kiss ass-y though, imo.
also, too much first person talking, and too much 'i' and 'me.'
but i agree with pretty much everything else, so pos.
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.5
lol what is this?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
but i agree with pretty much everything else, so pos.
Thanks
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
I like that you pointed out the good and the bad, but proof-reading would be helpful I think. Pos'd.
|
| |
|
|