Tera Melos Patagonian Rats
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
mecca
September 12th 2010


87 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

no i didn't jump on him lol. he and i have actually been getting along pretty well. i'm sure he

didn't think i was attacking him, and i wasn't even talking directly to him, but instead in general to

the people talking about ratings. i just honestly don't think they're a very big deal, and that

they're taken too seriously here (and probably everywhere), that's just how i feel.



i really don't think my comment was such a "crazy tangent"--it was addressing the issue at hand, the

ratings. maybe the language was aggressive, but i didn't think so. sorry.

MaskAtTheMasquerade
September 12th 2010


2924 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

i'd like some tabs for this album but we all know that's not gonna happen lolololololol

jesusjuice1179
September 12th 2010


1784 Comments


this album would be awesome if it weren't so damn repetitive

nicholasarthur
September 12th 2010


87 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I agree the rating system is flawed to a certain degree but what rating system isn't for things like this. Also the reason I didn't really go in depth about my rating is because Mecca did a great job with being really in depth with his review and I thought it'd be repetitive if I did basically the same thing with a similar rating. My review was just meant to be short version of my opinion with some analysis of the highlights that I felt wouldn't be fully expressed in a sound off.

mecca
September 12th 2010


87 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

"but what rating system isn't for things like this."



yep.







and sorry TMobotron if i was an asshole. didn't mean to be.

porch
September 12th 2010


8455 Comments


the ratings system is fine, just use some common sense and don't render it worthless by giving classic
ratings to albums that have just been released. it's pretty simple really

"Also the reason I didn't really go in depth about my rating is because Mecca did a great job with
being really in depth with his review and I thought it'd be repetitive if I did basically the same
thing with a similar rating"

yeah this doesn't really make sense either



mozambique
September 12th 2010


104 Comments


lol @ bitching this album is getting for 5's

Enotron
September 12th 2010


7695 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

lol @ shallow rating



Enotron
September 12th 2010


7695 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

and bad grammar for that matter.

mozambique
September 12th 2010


104 Comments


lol yeah i agree, this album is awesome

Enotron
September 12th 2010


7695 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

yeah dude this album rox!



rating: classic, 5/5



logic fails





mozambique
September 12th 2010


104 Comments


dude i know it roxx. glad to see we're on the same page here. you know you wanna rate it a 5 ;-)

Enotron
September 12th 2010


7695 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off

if i ever get imprisoned for fifteen years like that asian dude in oldboy and it's the first thing I hear when being let free, then yeah I will

mozambique
September 12th 2010


104 Comments


nah bro

TMobotron
September 12th 2010


7253 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

lol a not-so-subtle way of saying this is a 3. go listen to trident trail or something :P.







And no mecca you weren't an asshole at all you come off as pretty diplomatic usually to me.



I still think there is a big difference between 4.5 and 5, since 5 is the highest rating you can give something, it kind of implies that there's not a lot on the album that could be improved upon. Which I don't think is the case here. But I do respect that 5 can mean different things for different people.





mecca
September 12th 2010


87 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

@porch



it's rendered automatically useless cz it's assigning quantitative values to opinions, it is a huge

lapse in logic. it assumes objectivity where there is none. if everyone everywhere

had innately the same ideas as to what each rating really meant, then yeah there would be no

problem, but as it stands we all have different archetypes of the 5 or classic album. so yeah,

objectively and statistically useless.



case in point: my opinion of a 5 and of a classic and yours. i don't see "classic" as being defined

temporally, but you do, so we and the rating system are at irreparable odds.



here's ONE definition of classic--"authoritative and perfect as a standard of its kind." so really,

it's completely plausible someone here gives an album a 5 after only a few listens (which not even i

did).





nicholasarthur
September 12th 2010


87 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Same argument over and over and over...



And to porch's comment on a comment I made earlier...it had to do with something SeaAnemone said earlier in the conversation about analyzing the songs more if I'm going to give it a 5.

Aids
September 12th 2010


24929 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

"if i ever get imprisoned for fifteen years like that asian dude in oldboy and it's the first thing I hear when being let free, then yeah I will"



Hahahaha holy shit that is all sorts of win.



People arguing rating over this (or anything) is stupid. Especially when it's not a 3 nor a 5, but a 4 haha.

TMobotron
September 12th 2010


7253 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0 | Sound Off

oh daesu? love that movie

Thane
September 12th 2010


2291 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

"People arguing rating over this (or anything) is stupid. Especially when it's not a 3 nor a 5, but a 4 haha."



Never thought I'd say it, but Aids ftw



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy