Album Rating: 5.0

I will fuck them senseless

Album Rating: 5.0

This might take awhile then

Album Rating: 5.0

Gaga is more than fine in my books



No substance? He's going down.

I agree with the reviewer that some people really want to narrowly define music, I think this may have started in the 90s. But what it should really be about is the music and not trying to reduce the music according to genre or sub-genre criteria. Musicians end up pandering to this limited approach from audience and critics and it results in some really dull music.

And being perfect on an instrument (including vocals) isn't the only sign of music being musical, musical creativity can go beyond that. There are different ways of expressing that's why there are different kinds of music.

Sorry to be that guy, but MC5, Stooges, and VU werent all kindred bands, they werent even involved in the same scene. MC5 precursed the Stooges, and the VU were active before Stooges formed and were from NYC, not from Detroit. Also, Kinks/Yardbirds ect were DEFINITELY not influences for this album or the Stooges in general, try Howlin' Wolf, Free Jazz, and garage rock (sonics ect).

Album Rating: 5.0

one of the best albums ever

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

Tha's how good Rock N' Roll is supposed to be: slightly fast, angry, badass, DIRTY.I got goosebumps everytime i hear Izzy's screams.

Album Rating: 5.0

Easily the best rock album ever made (only Highway 61 Revisited could be viewed as better)

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

loooooooooooooooooord !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHH !!!!!!

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

DIRTY is the best way to describe Fun House.

Album Rating: 5.0

FUCKING T.V. EYE! Also, 1970 competes for best track.

does anyone know whether it's worth getting the CD remaster of this, as in, does it sound
significantly better than the original?

Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

I have listened to both versions and i didn't notice any great difference. Buy the remaster version only if there are any extra available tracks.

fair enough, cheers.

Album Rating: 4.5

SEEE THAT CAAAAAHT

Album Rating: 5.0

Think I'm going to crank this



now

Album Rating: 4.0

Furioso. It's beginning with Down in the street, kind of violent recovery of Out in the Street. 1970(I feel alright) and the eponymous song Fun House are just crazy, thanks to an amazing saxophone. We can't forget Hot Rats (Zappa) and Bitches Brew(Davis), released the same year, as strong as the musical anarchy hard at work in Fun House.

Album Rating: 4.0

Furioso. Listen to this is like destroying a brick wall with a trowel. Down in the street seems a hard recovery of Out in Street in the first Who's album. The three last songs are just crazy, 1970, the eponymous Fun House and the LA Blues, amazing, thanks to the saxophone. This musical anarchy is quite similar to Hots Rats and Bitches Brew, released the same year, and it's not the worst comparison we could make with.

Album Rating: 5.0

The perfect album. Everything about the album is pitch perfect.

Album Rating: 4.5

Has there ever been a better album to fucking blast as loud as possible?