this is decent, provided that someone doesn't know the band's colossal work in the 70's and at the dawn of 80's.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
^I can definitely understand people hold this in a higher regard if they're only familiar with Sabbath's more popular work (e.g. having only heard Paranoid). For any seasoned Sabbath fan though, this is a piece of crap.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Ya
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Hey Mr. Mackenzie, what happened to yer username there?
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
I changed it to what I intended it to be from the beginning, figured seeing as you can pronounce it exactly the same as before it wouldn't make too much of a difference
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
I'd just change it to Leprechaun, that would serve your Irishhood even better.
|
| |
Short and sweet review for a sour and sweet Sabbath (never heard a single note out of this one). pos'd
I can't wait for your 'Thrak' review.
|
| |
I'm currently hearing this, I will be rating it soon.
|
| |
It's an okay record, but nothing above the Ozzy Era, and certainly not above the Dio Era. I think Martin's major flaw is that he is a Dio wannabe, and lacks his own style.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I love Black Sabbath, and I believe this is quite good, (doesnt deserve a 1.5, for sure)
|
| |
Yeah this rocks
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
'' Black Sabbath simply doesn't exist after Mob Rules"...... are you retarded or smt?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
First three songs are pretty good.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
You may as well just admit that you're retarded for implying that Headless Cross is bad.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Wouldn’t disagree. His reasoning for Headless Cross being a 1.5 is laughable at best
|
| |
|
|
