Album Rating: 3.5

I can't be #1?

Album Rating: 2.5

Besides spitting out uninformed "facts" about the band and the genre, this review is terrible

Album Rating: 3.5

The only uninformed fact was the fact that they were the founding fathers of the genre and that has been deleted. However, I am curious of how this review is terrible? Please, tell me. I would love to be taken under your wing to train to be the most epic reviewer ever!

Album Rating: 1.5

The only uninformed fact was the fact that they were the founding fathers of the genre and that has been deleted.

As a matter of fact, the first song “Devolver” features some interesting harmonies by the trio.

Album Rating: 2.5

It's a mish-mash of god-awful writing and terrible sentence structure. And no, I don't write reviews, because I don't pretend like I have the ability to. It's like you are trying to say something profound about the album, when you are truly just masturbating into your own hand.

or saying they are the founding fathers of the genre what a idiot

Album Rating: 2.5

It also doesn't matter that you deleted the comment. It shows that you are willing to say anything, regardless if it is fact or not, to write a review. You don't truly think out what you are saying, and now I think you'll just say anything on this site to get attention.

Album Rating: 3.5

Explain to me how the sentence structure is terrible, genius? Is it readable? Is it coherent? Your statement is extremely vague. Last time I checked, most of the punctuation is right (there might be some typo's I missed, but that can be easily fixed), so how is the sentence structure terrible? Does it contain run-on sentences? Fragments? Please, let me know. I would love to be told how to write a review by someone who lacks the ability to write one themselves. And how exactly am I trying to say something profound about the album? It's not amazing and it's not terrible. It's a pretty good release. Do you even know where you're going with this or are you just arguing for the sake of sounding like a jackass?

Album Rating: 2.0

I tried to be nice...

Album Rating: 1.5

Your statement is extremely vague.

dont call anyone a jackass zilla thats mean youre terrible

Album Rating: 2.0

Band sucks, yet is one of the best deathcore bands around.

Album Rating: 3.5

"or saying they are the founding fathers of the genre what a idiot"



It was a slip up and it's been deleted. I'm not denying I screwed that part up. It was a small mistake. I never said it to garner attention of any sort. I suppose what I had on my mind was that the band is responsible for skyrocketing the genre to the heights it's at now and was part of the Myspace Deathcore explosion along with others like Job For A Cowboy, Impending Doom, and more.

Album Rating: 2.5

Dude, you need to calm down. Don't have a shit fit because someone disagrees with your rating or think your review is garbage. If you don't want criticism, don't write a review. Simple as that. So take a pill, pour yourself a drink, and sit down and relax. Everything will be okay.



Now, for your review:

"See, while “A New Era of Corruption” is not drastically different enough to entice haters of Deathcore to jump on board and give it a spin, it is mature enough to draw some attention and incite some definite hope for a band that many thought would never be able to mature beyond the point of constant breakdowns"



Damn, that's a long sentence. Don't you think you could break that down into a few different, separate thoughts?





" Oh, Deathcore! You have become quite popular amongst the fad enticed teenagers of the 21st century! With your constant breakdowns and simple song structures, you certainly have garnered quite a following of young, mindless metal wannabe’s who long for their next breakdown to dance horrendously to. As they flail and kick, I wonder what it is that has made this modern subgenre of Metal such a trendy thing? Is it originality? Why certainly not! This genre lacks any sliver of originality whatsoever. Perhaps we will never get to the bottom of the very important question: “Just why do people love this crap?”



That isn't needed. It makes you sound like you are above the demographic you are trying to appeal to. It also just sounds plain fucking stupid and doesn't belong in this.





Those are just two examples. I'm tired and bit drunk, so I'm not going to go through the whole thing now. If you want more reasons why I think this isn't a good review, call 1-800-Fuck-Off

Album Rating: 3.5

"lol Hypocrisy



Maybe you should get over it, pal."



How was the review vague? You guys are so willing to point out issues but not willing to discuss exactly what you are talking about. If you want the review improved then please let me know what you are referring to, otherwise, kiss ass.

it was a "slip up" cuz you been cought and deleting it is only hiding your tracks which we already say

Album Rating: 2.0

How was the review vague? You guys are so willing to point out issues but not willing to discuss exactly what you are talking about. If you want the review improved then please let me know what you are referring to, otherwise, kiss ass.

Album Rating: 2.5

Be careful, Dryden. He's Shredzilla. He must Shred a lot

from this review he can only play open string breakdowns

Album Rating: 2.5

Consider yourself buck-futted