yeah i gotta second that. the review reads easy. i never get tempted to skip a paragraph.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0 | Sound Off
Very cool, been waiting for this. I obviously agree, nice review.
I feel as if I was really let down big time by this band.
|
| |
I smell a conspiracy.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
*sigh*
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
was contemplating lowering this to a 3 but i think i'll need a few more listen.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
While instrumentally the band is sound and well-suited for the type of metal they create, Ikuinen Kaamos seem to have misplaced a bit of purpose, distinction, melody, and probably the most obvious aspect upon first listening to Fall Of Icons, Closure-like atmosphere in their newly crafted work. That, right there, was the basis for my entire review so now I don't need to do one. Great job. (you do need to change that period to a comma in the last sentence of the first paragraph, though).It disturbs me (in a good way) to think about the amount of new releases you must be listening to now that you have a staff job. Where else do you review?
|
| |
Thank you guys, and thanks for catching that typo, Willie.
I review as a staff for www.reviewrinserepeat.com and as a staff/contributor for www.thealbumproject.net. Any of that is really thanks to this site, though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Do you review under the same screen name as here?
|
| |
I just use my real name there too - Jared Ponton or Jared P. Haha, Observer is just for sputnik.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Cool. I'm going to go be nosey.
|
| |
they finally put me here haha: http://www.reviewrinserepeat.com/staff/
Both of those sites focus on pop-rock, pop punk, indie and the more popular hard stuff, which I get to cover I think.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Both of those sites focus on pop-rock, pop punk, indie and the more popular hard stuff That explains why I've never heard of those two sites, ha ha. Still going check them out, though.
|
| |
Haha yeah, that and they definitely aren't huge or anything. They are growing a lot from what I know, though.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
No, I wasn't talking about whether they're big sites or not... I just meant that even though I like pop punk (and the occasional popular harder album), I don't really go to sites that focus on that stuff as much as I do the metal/industrial stuff.
|
| |
Oh, gotcha. I used to strictly go to those sites, but last year I got into a lot of metal for some reason, so I make a lot of rounds to a lot of places.
Also, kingsoby informed me that I shouldn't contact a label with affiliation to the site unless im a staff or contri, which he is right about. I'll really sorry about that, and I'll stay away from it. These guys' label seemed okay with my just being a user, but still I really shouldn't have.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
Yeah, him and I were just talking about that. I was under the impression that you contacted them based on one of the other two sites. The mods don't take kindly to people soiling the sputnik name - unless those people have been promoted to name-soiling status ;)
|
| |
Yeah just make sure to say you're not affiliated and all's well.
Good review.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
You've got a girl on staff... I'm jealous.
|
| |
Yeah, I mentioned that I had the other positions and that that I was a user writer here, even explaining that I couldn't post this until the release date. They were interested in the Carach Angren reviews I had done here (that band is on their label too), so they sent me an invite. That's really my bad though. Zoo mentioned that I could get on their promo list easily, so I just went with it without considering a few things.
|
| |
Mmm the coveted female music journalist...
|
| |
|
|
