Album Rating: 1.0

Father time has not been as kind to the 'Stones as they would have hoped. Their last 4 or 5 albums have been uncomprimisingly bad. I wish I could say that all that has changed. It hasn't, and so, The Rolling Stones have not entered the 21st Century with a bang as big as they would have hoped.





Instead of looking to the future Keith & Mick, put down your Axes and listen to the glory days.

I actually really liked this album. Although I don't like "Sweet Neo Con" the rest of the album is solid all around.

Also, people are always bashing The Stones at my school, saying "They're too old too play!" But I went to their live show this week and they blew everyone away.

I think I was the only one there under the legal drinking age, but they were incredible.

Sorry, double post.

[Edit]This Message Edited On 11.29.05

great band but they should really stop touring before one of them dies. i hear they have a portable defibilator(or however u spell it) backstage at all their shows. good band still rockin the classics but new stuff isnt as good

Rolling stones-Very overatted band who get buy on how long they been together. who cares how old you are, your music still sucks!

Part of the reason they suck is because thyve been togrther so long they should died or quit while they were ahead.
Take a hint from the "real" greats of rock-Hendrix, Zeppelin, Sabbath, cream.
The rolling stones are just like u2 if you think about it, they havnt released a good album in over 20 years and yet they still think they all that.
Pitiful attempt at an album.

Album Rating: 4.0

Take a hint from the "real" greats of rock-Hendrix, Zeppelin, Sabbath, cream.

Someone reviewed this? Awesome. The cover of this album is so funny.
Rain Fell Down is allright.

^^
Just because a member from the first two bands died it made them even more legendary, I agree that sabbath sucked after ozzy left, but when he was there sabbath ruled!
You should check out cream, they are a bit like zeppelin, a bit like hendrix but still brilliant!

Cut it out. The fact that a band has such longetivity says something. And the Stones were just as vital to the evolution of rock as Zeppelin or Cream, even if by now they should just trade guitars for hip replacements.

Album Rating: 4.0

Ha at the idiot calling the Rolling Stones overrated while name dropping Cream.

(To Rocksta) Yeah dude, the Rolling Stones are too old.
I'm glad Ginger Baker still looks young.
http://www.drummerworld.com/pics/drum37/gingerbaker2.jpg

^^hahaha....HA!

I like this album quite a lot. Gotta give credit where credit is due even if the guys are old and the band as well. This is the Stones, pure and simple. Didn't think they has this in them anymore myself, but these songs and this record is extremely solid.This Message Edited On 06.29.06

Cream were around for 3 years, but in that short amount of time they ruled! longevity is not a good thing especially if you suck to begin with.The rolling stones should have got out when they were in front.This Message Edited On 06.30.06(if they ever were?)This Message Edited On 06.30.06

Album Rating: 1.0

User Album Rating: 4



even though i jsut got it today i have to say that for a bunch of 60 year old men this cd rox my sox.

longevity is not a good thing

Cream were around for 3 years, but in that short amount of time they ruled!

especially if you suck to begin with.The rolling stones should have got out when they were in front.

i have to admit, the Stones are well past their prime. people go to their shows because they are the rolling stones. i really think they need to stop, think for a while, actually put their heart and soul into an album, and blow everyone away. i know that they could do it.

Rather release one good recording and quit, than release 30+ cr*p recordings.

Album Rating: 4.5

no one on this site can spell worth a sh%^



it's very annoying

Album Rating: 1.0

^ Yeah...





This cd is utter and unabashed shit. This Message Edited On 08.10.06