Album Rating: 4.0

to each his own bro

Album Rating: 2.0

Fair assessment above me^^^.

But seriously, look at this guy's other reviews... Mandy Moore, and Crowpath? What're we doing here??

Album Rating: 2.0

I wanted to call that kid out so badly.

Album Rating: 4.0

"fffff this album neeeeeeeeds more emotion its just technicalittty "



how this review reads

Album Rating: 2.0

Sure it does except for the fact that you totally skewed his thoughts entirely.

Album Rating: 4.0

whats so bad about this album wizard?

Album Rating: 2.5

I wanted to call that kid out so badly.

Album Rating: 2.0

i guess i can kinda agree with the review, but after 10 reviews in, this should've been written better and/or thoroughly... especially when trying to justify a 1.5 for a highly rated album.



not gonna jump on the bandwagon and neg though.

Album Rating: 4.5

Judging from your review, it seems you think that this album is just mediocre. The review does not justify a 1.5 rating, except that you want to bait flamers.

^ Exactly. This doesn't read like a 1.5 at all, maybe a 2-2.5. If you're going to rate an album that low, you need to give valid reasons why, which this review doesn't.

album is awful, didnt read but at least the rating is right

I used to fucking love this, now i only listen to All Dark Graves, Leica, and Ghost of a Stranger off of it.

Album Rating: 2.0

whats so bad about this album wizard?



A really bad example of tech death metal. Plus the breakdowns are horrendous.

i still like leica

an autopsy is pretty wack

Album Rating: 4.0

I really like this album, but the review was decently written, so I won't neg it.

yeah, leica has that cool keyboard thing near the end. rest of the song is just repetitive.

Album Rating: 2.0

Just a reminder to all the faggots that decided to neg this:



Was this Review Well Written? Yes | No



and not



Do You Agree With This Persons Opinion? Yes | No

Album Rating: 4.0

"You're an idiot. This is just basic metal. Not post grind hardcore breakdown core shredfest meltdown music. Music for the sake of music. That's all. When this came out in 2006 there hadn't been anything this close to a worthy listen since Animosity's "Empires." I guess it's not Cryptopsy, so let's keep bitching."



..."But seriously, look at this guy's other reviews... Mandy Moore, and Crowpath? What're we doing here??"



Agreed......Poorly written, and poorly rated. At the time of this album's release, there really WAS nothing else this impressive and new sounding - People criticize and analyze albums FAR too much these days; You must realise that in the end - This IS still just music - Metal to be exact but no time for semantics.



If I wanted to, I TOO could sit here for an hour and think of stuff that's wrong with this album and all other bands that fall in line with this - But, why would I? If you stop for a second, and remove your head from your ass (which I have to do as well occasionally), then you'll realise that all in all this is a good listen, albeit a few minor annoyances that you or I may not immediately agree with, but why shun and ignore an obviously talented group that has solid material, over 1 issue? It's pointless. And it ultimately deprives you of experience and what could end up being a rather enjoyable listen.



This is essentially referring to all types of Analysis and Criticism involved nowadays in music, but this album in particular as well.



Quick example - Enfold Darkness' debut album (I understand I did a review of this album, this is not my point) - Almost immediately after this album was put on the front page, people started calling it "The Faceless Glorification"....In which case - It doesnt even sound like it. Also, a good majority of people said that their music was good, but the vocals were unlistenable - So they wouldnt even give it a chance. (Being what I said about people finding 1 thing wrong with an album and it ultimately turning them off to it)....Thats pointless.



Dont deprive yourself of good music just because of 1 tiny little nuance.