Guns N' Roses Appetite for Destruction
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
LepreCon
October 7th 2009


5482 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Album rating is correct, review is good, Album owns serious face

SmurkinGherkin
October 7th 2009


2253 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Not a 5

KILL
October 7th 2009


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0



Album rating is correct, review is good, Album owns serious face


[img]http://www.reliquaryoflight.com/images/2006.07.04.jpg[/img]



Relinquished
October 7th 2009


50089 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

seen more serious

Greggers
October 7th 2009


2375 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

[img]http://marlinco.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/spottswoode.jpg[/img]

Relinquished
October 7th 2009


50089 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

[img]http://ihasahotdog.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/funny-dog-pictures-why-so-serious.jpg[/img]

KILL
October 7th 2009


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

[img]http://ravegrl.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/038_yuugi_my_serious_face.jpg[/img]

just for you Relinquished



Relinquished
October 7th 2009


50089 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

lol ok

klap
Emeritus
October 7th 2009


12410 Comments


generally doesn't one write a review that reflects one's rating?

Nagrarok
October 7th 2009


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Indeed, you make a good point. Generally. Besides, 4.5 is pretty close to 5, innit?

klap
Emeritus
October 7th 2009


12410 Comments


true dat, but that 5 has a special power you gotta admit. really takes that extra oomph for an album to be a 5 as opposed to a 4.5

Nagrarok
October 7th 2009


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I WAS highly doubting between a 4.5 and 5.

stargazer76
October 7th 2009


218 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

Good review.



Agree with most of the last paragraph - "This album is the legacy of returning heavy music back into the mainstream, more than anything else. And it that sense, yes, Appetite for Destruction IS a classic".



For me it really needs to be more than that for a 5 "classic" rating.



Nagrarok
October 7th 2009


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I can perfectly understand that, but the actual music is also great. What you think of this album really depends on what perspective you choose to take.

Douchebag
October 7th 2009


3626 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

I remember when I first heard this is thought that the singles were amazing and that was about it, but then I went on a car trip and the album just clicked and it somehow became a classic album. I think I listened to it in it's entirety about 7 times in one weekend.



Sadly because of the constant enjoyment i've somewhat worn it out, it's still good for a play every now and then though, might put it on later!

shindip
October 8th 2009


3539 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

cant stand this album really, aside from Mr Brownstone and Sweet Child

KILL
October 8th 2009


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

yea its alright

MaskAtTheMasquerade
October 8th 2009


2924 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

now that i think about it, i still need to go to target and buy a guns and roses shirt

Chewie
October 8th 2009


4544 Comments


your reviews are fucking great man, the intro made me read the whole thing

PanasonicYouth
October 8th 2009


7413 Comments


ugh
album is so lame



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy