^ The best part of that post was the "Trust me, I was there" at the end. It only served to highlight the stupidity of the rest of it.

[QUOTE=Crashingleg]^ The best part of that post was the "Trust me, I was there" at the end. It only served to highlight the stupidity of the rest of it.[/QUOTE]

:lol: , you guys are mean :p

[QUOTE=Crashingleg]How were Nirvana BEFORE punk? Since punk started in the 70's I'm finding it hard to see your point here.[/QUOTE]


No, punk didn't really start in the 70s... ROCK started in the 70s... people are so quick to mix the two. Punk is.. punk is just different, in my opinion anyways... I see Eddie Vedder as one of the truely first original punks.

[QUOTE=A.Girl.Called.Kill]No, punk didn't really start in the 70s... ROCK started in the 70s... people are so quick to mix the two. Punk is.. punk is just different, in my opinion anyways... I see Eddie Vedder as one of the truely first original punks.[/QUOTE]
What were The Ramones, The Clash and The Saints then?

Album Rating: 4.5

In utero : 4.75/5



Take that, you off-topic whores.

[QUOTE=A.Girl.Called.Kill]No, punk didn't really start in the 70s... ROCK started in the 70s... people are so quick to mix the two. Punk is.. punk is just different, in my opinion anyways... I see Eddie Vedder as one of the truely first original punks.[/QUOTE]



Oh I see, everybody in the world has gotten their genres confused except you.

[QUOTE=Crashingleg]Oh I see, everybody in the world has gotten their genres confused except you.[/QUOTE]

pwned!!!

I enjoy Radio Friendly Unit Shifter..thats a great song..

[QUOTE=Riddlin_Kid]I enjoy Radio Friendly Unit Shifter..thats a great song..[/QUOTE]
I'm glad I'm not the only one. Yeah that song rocks. Ever since I heard it I refer to anything radio friendly that I don't like as a "Radio friendly unit shifter." :lol:

Use just once and destroy
Invasion of our piracy
Afterbirth of a nation
Starve without your skeleton key

[QUOTE=A.Girl.Called.Kill]No, punk didn't really start in the 70s... ROCK started in the 70s... people are so quick to mix the two. Punk is.. punk is just different, in my opinion anyways... I see Eddie Vedder as one of the truely first original punks.[/QUOTE]

:lol:

Rock started in the '60s you genius you. Punk started in the '70s. Oh wait....but if punk was all 90's.....what are the sex pistols, the clash, the ramones and the grateful dead?

^^ That's what I asked but I got no answer...

If you want to get technical, Rock N' Roll actually started in the 50's.

[QUOTE=br3ad_man]^^ That's what I asked but I got no answer...

If you want to get technical, Rock N' Roll actually started in the 50's.[/QUOTE]

If you count Elvis as a rocker :lol: I hate Elvis :chug:

[QUOTE=Hydrogen_Apple]If you count Elvis as a rocker :lol: I hate Elvis :chug:[/QUOTE]

But your forgetting chuck berry!

Album Rating: 1.0

[QUOTE=A.Girl.Called.Kill]No, punk didn't really start in the 70s... ROCK started in the 70s... people are so quick to mix the two. Punk is.. punk is just different, in my opinion anyways... I see Eddie Vedder as one of the truely first original punks.[/QUOTE]



Eddie Vedder ?, as in the Eddie Vedder that is in Pearl Jam and that Scott Stapp gets accused of ripping off all of the time? Because if so, your post has just officially swept any competition away to take its rightful place as the dumbest thing I have ever heard, seen, or read.



Anyway, I'd have to say that at best this is a 2.5, but that's being generous. I'd be inclined to say 1.5 or 2. I guess I'm just not a fan of Nirvana. That whole 3 powerchord, 4 note solo thing just doesn't work for me. *is a guitar snob*



Edit: Excuse me, their songs usually have 4 powerchords, not 3.

[QUOTE=epifreak2002]Eddie Vedder ?, as in the Eddie Vedder that is in Pearl Jam and that Scott Stapp gets accused of ripping off all of the time? Because if so, your post has just officially swept any competition away to take its rightful place as the dumbest thing I have ever heard, seen, or read.

Anyway, I'd have to say that at best this is a 2.5, but that's being generous. I'd be inclined to say 1.5 or 2. I guess I'm just not a fan of Nirvana. That whole 3 powerchord, 4 note solo thing just doesn't work for me. *is a guitar snob*

Edit: Excuse me, their songs usually have 4 powerchords, not 3.[/QUOTE]

Steve Albini hates you.

:evil:

Album Rating: 1.0

^Huh?

steve is that dood recorded in utero

and its amazing how 4 powerchords and 4 note solos sound sooo can god**** good

a song doesnt have to have some complex **** just to sound good

[QUOTE=DrEmineM]a song doesnt have to have some complex **** just to sound good [/QUOTE]



X 1,000,000



Why do more people not get this?

Album Rating: 1.0

^It's not just the lack of complexity that makes me not like them. That's just a convenient excuse for my underlying gripe.......I just don't like 'em.

everyone have their own opinion but ur opinion, epifreak, sucks! :p ;)