Album Rating: 4.0
it sounds like "Cosmogenesis" by Obscura
Sounds nothing like that.
|
| |
vocals are a huge turn off, they're layered too thick and overpower the music
Watershed is sweet song though
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
*and no,
yea I thought that part was off, but I don't think "and no," would work there. dunno.
Just because your expectations were tech death metal doesn't mean the band had to follow that formula. This criticism is like saying "Because I was expecting this to be pop and it turned out to be rock, I don't like it".
no seriously, just listen to it. it sounds annoyingly happy and melodic.
What do you expect? This is tech metal. Try listening to Spawn of Possession.
usually with technical death metal, i appreciate the album more with further listening
giving this album 2.5 is a massive fail
shut up benzum
|
| |
great album = 3.5
l2sputnik douche
|
| |
yeah BRo
|
| |
i thought this was enjoyable
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Album is a 3.5.
Review is a 2.5.
Review reads like a 1.5.
And was I just imagining that there was another review of this?
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Leading Vision is better but Programmers of Decline is their best song imo. This really grew on me though, it was like a solid 3 at first but now it's pushing a 4.5.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.2
I'm not going to neg, but you should definitely spend more time on your reviews.
I have heard this enough to rate it, but not enough to really argue most of your points (Except the one's that have already been pointed out).
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
what do i specifically need to work on?
spend more time on your reviews is pretty general
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.2
Yeah, I kind of wanted it to be general. I don't really like to post all sorts of corrections/suggestions on someone's review unless they specifically ask for it or are being an asshole ;)
My main issue with the review is that it kind of seems like it was done during a caffeine rush (I've done it and they turn out like this). I'm trying to say that the review seems to jump from one thought to the next with complete disregard to flow and there is just too much crammed into most sentences. Almost like a kid on a sugar rush telling a story. A few examples:
Expectations are a bitch, but when I think back now it was pretty foolish to think that Gorod a French technical death metal band, could release an album that could even come close to (or surpass) their magnum opus: Leading Vision. In this sentence, a lot of things could be trimmed down while still conveying the same information. Also, you need the word "to" after "close".
Now, instead of progressing their own unique sound (like the one from Neurotripsicks to Leading Vision) it seems like Gorod are imitating generic technical death metal bands, making Process of a New Decline nothing more than a run-of-the-mill tech death album, crushing all expectations. Again, this sentence could be trimmed and still say the same thing without being so convoluted (that whole first paragraph could use some trimming). Example: On Process of a New Decline Gorod have stopped progressing (I'd use "furthering" though) their sound, and instead are content to imitate other generic tech death bands. This leads to nothing more than a run-of-the-mill tech death album that falls well below expectations.
A tapping section follows, it starts off good - but then eventually it becomes overbearing due to how long it lasts - although it is still pretty impressive and the song regains its momentum afterwards. This sentence just swings back and forth, almost like you can't decide what to say. Both sides of what you're saying are valid, but swinging back and forth like that makes it seem less so. Example: This is followed by a good tapping section that only suffers due to how long it lasts, but it still ends up being impressive enough to allow the song to regain momentum afterwards.
Basically, go through your sentences and try to split them up, focus them, and drop all of the extra words that might not be necessary.
|
| |
Album Rating: 2.5
Thanks Willie.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
This album is ballin' and the review is a 2.5. I agree it is not as awesome as the previous entries, but it would be hard to top leading visions. If they gave us a leading visions 2 I would have been pissed. I like the polished production. Hell, maybe I am a fanboy in denial, but I am sure this is high-quality H20.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
gonna put my review up this weekend maybe
|
| |
I kinda agree with the review that gorod has gone back into 'every other tech-death band' territory. But its still a solid album i think. I might have to lower my rating though.
|
| |
|
|
