well if south doesn't like it then everyone should ESPECIALLY stay away

Album Rating: 3.0

the album is good it's just not gimmicky nuthrash



also, "sounds weird"/"dislikes".This Message Edited On 04.30.09

Didn't say that I didn't like it. It's solid, it's just that the production is terrible and I am usually all for lame production.

Album Rating: 3.0

Yeah, I'm all for raw and untouched but this just sounds muted and like they recorded it 50 feet from their instruments.

Can you provide an allusion using Nattens Madrigal?

Album Rating: 3.0

Nattens Madrigal's production is perfect for the music. This sounds like Nattens Madrigal if they put a towel over the microphone before they pressed play.

Works for me. Guess I'll give it a shot, thrash albums always have at least one noteworthy song.

Album Rating: 3.0

I mean musically it's great. It's just that if it wasn't so muted and trebly this album would have been even better. It holds it back not because it's raw, but because it sounds bad.

Review was perfect. I mean, what else needs to be said about the genre that hasn't been said before?

Will give this a go.

"Review was perfect."

Agreed.

not enough attention given to my funny joke

i guess that's what i get for posting in a good review!

"not enough attention given to my funny joke"

Probably 'cause a trash can would have better acoustics.

Album Rating: 3.0

i assumed his joke was that some people often write 'trash' instead of 'thrash'

my thrashcan is made of titanium

not into destroyer 666, doubt ill like this

Good review. I'll have to check this out.

Ok I saw this and had to hear it. This and St.Anger are the shitest mixes of an album ever. And the worst guitar tone I have yet to hear. And why did Metallica pick Rubin to do DM just listen to this shit lol. I would rather do it myself.