Editors The Back Room
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
AliW1993
February 10th 2009


7511 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Good review, as usual. I haven't heard this yet, I've been meaning to check it out for ages. I actually saw them live supporting Franz Ferdinand a few years ago, and thought they were pretty average tbh. Munich is an amazing song though.

Fugue
February 10th 2009


7371 Comments


great review, great album, and IMO correct rating - you hit the jackpot Davey :-). This is far better than their disappointing second effort and the vocals on this are pretty awesome at painting a bleak image.

since it was rather hyped (deserved or not) Indie album.


This would be because it is a British indie album, about 90% of them get hyped whether they are good or not.This Message Edited On 02.10.09

Nagrarok
February 10th 2009


8656 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Great review as usual. I like Editors, both this and their second, but I think its a tad too repetitve to earn a 4.

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
February 10th 2009


22500 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Thanks Kane. It seems that people are liking me writing a shorter review. Of course, if I could control my writing length always, I probably would.

Thanks on the review Spamue1. I don't know about "dull & lifeless". I mean, I am not even a great fan of indie music and I find this ok. To each their own I guess.

Oh man, Editors & Franz at the same gig would have been a massive show Ali. I mean, they're different types of bands, but still.

Great to see you also agree on the rating Ross... Of course, we are going to disagree a little on the follow-up, but one out of two ain't bad & we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. And LOL re your comment on any British Indie album being hyped. You're probably not too far wrong on that.

Thanks Nagrarok. I do think their is an argument for the band being a little repetitive. But I tend to think that if it's good, then I don't mind a little repetition.

robin
February 10th 2009


4596 Comments


good review dave, i've only heard an end has a start but now i'm inclined to check this out. no doubt you'll review that one after you've finished off badly drawn boy.

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
February 10th 2009


22500 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Thanks Robin. I would have put money on you having heard both of the Editors album. Oh well, at least I would have won my money back on betting on you making a Badly Drawn Boy reference. One day I might shock you... I will expect a gold star if I do!

SeaAnemone
February 10th 2009


21429 Comments


Great review... though I have to say this bored me. "Munich" is superb, but there was a real dropoff afterwards for me.

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
February 11th 2009


22500 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I actually noticed your rather low rating before posting this review SeaAnemone. It seems that 'Munich' pretty much impressed everyone, but the rest has not necessarily done the same. While I definitely think that is the highlight track, I don't think the dropoff was all that bad myself. But thanks for the positive feedback on the review anyway.

AtavanHalen
February 11th 2009


17919 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I liked this. I look forward to your review of their next record.

Douchebag
February 11th 2009


3626 Comments


lol Haven't heard of these guys either!
However I'm starting my third review! whoop whoop!

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
February 11th 2009


22500 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I thought you'd be a semi-Editors fan DavID, although your "looking forward to your review of their next record" confuses me a little. I guess that means you thought it may not have been up to the standard of this debut?

Croc, these guys are sort of mainstream Indie. Your hard-rock loving tastes would only just be able to handle them I reckon.

Douchebag
February 11th 2009


3626 Comments


haha i dunno. I absolutley love arctic monkeys, are they indie?
more importantly my third review is up! check it out y'all!

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
February 11th 2009


22500 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

I guess the Arctic Monkeys are also mainstream indie, yet they are rather different bands. Where-as Alex Turner has a youthful thick-accented voice, Smith has a deep baritone that makes him sound older than he actually is. And where-as the Arctic Monkeys have a raw rocky sound to their music, the Editors rely more on U2 like soaring guitar melodies.

And yeah, I have stung your latest review Croc.

AliW1993
May 27th 2009


7511 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Just got this and its much better than I expected it to be. Really consistant and with a few amazing songs.

DaveyBoy
Emeritus
August 19th 2009


22500 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Good to hear you liked it Ali. And well summed up re: "Really consistant and with a few amazing songs"

conditionals
June 30th 2017


557 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Great review. Just spun this whole for the first time in about 12 years and I have to say, it doesn't really hold up. I'd 3.3 it if I could.

Demon of the Fall
June 30th 2017


34284 Comments


In my youth the topic of who out of these guys & Interpol were better seemed to come up semi-regularly for some reason. For the record it's Interpol.

conditionals
June 30th 2017


557 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Same as The Killers v The Bravery for me. For my record it was The Bravery.

Sinternet
Contributing Reviewer
August 6th 2017


26607 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

the bravery over the killers? damn son thats just wrong - literally their only good song was an honest mistake, whereas the killers had 2 and a half albums worth of good tracks

zakalwe
August 6th 2017


39145 Comments


It was all abysmal.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy