Album Rating: 5.0 | Sound Off

watch yo back cracka

Thanks for the tip, Holmes.

lol

Nice, you just repeated yourself without even making a single mistake.

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

I never replied to you, I've seen you before. I didn't even know you had commented.

interpol are pretty good

Album Rating: 3.5

only interpol worth anyone's time



solid stuff too

I dunno, man, Antics was pretty good.

Album Rating: 4.0

antics was boring as hell

Album Rating: 5.0

And there is a couple of good tracks on OLTA.



Decent review but your rating of 2 sticks out like a sore thumb amongst the many 4's and 5's.

Album Rating: 4.5

this review disturbs my soul

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

nice dig

there aren't any good tracks on OLTA, but antics is really great also.

no one hates this review wooo.

Album Rating: 3.5

This is such a case of album-does-not-meet-my-individual-preferences-therefore-it-must-suck. The reasons for why this album gets a 2 are such bullshit, I almost think this was a troll review.....

Album Rating: 5.0

But a reviewer's opinion can only go so far.

Album Rating: 2.0 | Sound Off

so you mean that a minority opinion should be written off more often than not, or that anyone's opinion will only sway so many?

Album Rating: 5.0

no he means a retarded opinion

Album Rating: 4.5

natey: But the way this guy's doing it, his opinion isn't based on anything really. He justifies this album's sucking based on how the album interacts his personal mood. So basically he's assuming that he can never be wrong. Which is bullshit

you are such a fuc[FONT="Verdana"]k[/FONT]ing idiot

Album Rating: 4.5

No, that isn't how you do good reviews. They are supposed to have more objective material than subjective, even though listening to an album is a different experience for every single person. This review is about 5% objective, poorly argued, etc.