agreed. have you considered adding a more concise intro to this review tho?
i think that's the only factor preventing your reviews from being incredible

Album Rating: 5.0

what do you mean a more concise intro?

just meaning solid rhetoric. your intros tend to be nearly half of your reviews. makes for a difficult and at times confusing read. if you put a small 2-3 sentence intro to set the stage for your review by creating context your obviously impressive writing skills would sparkle.
quickly stated: more user friendly

Album Rating: 5.0

i guess. i've already written an introduction for this band twice though, there is no need to reiterate what i say especially since i don't exactly write these reviews for sputnik.. more so for my blog / rym. not really disagreeing just these aren't so much formal reviews as just my formulated thoughts on records.

very cool. if that's the case then this shouldn't be a featured review imo.
your mind works really interestingly and your thoughts are always worth reading but it doesn't make sense to have this premiered like its one of the best 'reviews'
and elitsu, go away

Need dis

how do they work?

Album Rating: 4.5

a secret that only staff knows about

is that secret process known as 'whoever calls it first'

'i don't exactly write these reviews for sputnik.. more so for my blog / rym. not really disagreeing just these aren't so much formal reviews as just my formulated thoughts on records.'
im not stoopid

note: that was the basis of my argument. its featured bc one would suggest that its a well written and informative review but he openly states that its not a review per se.

not important... just making sure we all understand each otherThis Message Edited On 07.20.08

Album Rating: 4.0

Pretty good review, this is an awesome release, a 5 seems a little hight but this is really good

Album Rating: 5.0

"'i don't exactly write these reviews for sputnik.. more so for my blog / rym. not really disagreeing just these aren't so much formal reviews as just my formulated thoughts on records.'

im not stoopid



note: that was the basis of my argument. its featured bc one would suggest that its a well written and informative review but he openly states that its not a review per se.



not important... just making sure we all understand each other"



what exactly is your point?



you don't even contribute to this site.

you and your overly intense opinions.
i wanted to give some constructive criticism on how to make your review have more impact.
and what's my point? you restated my point.
edit: all should just be nice to people, enjoy this site and contribute to benefit of the community. fug.This Message Edited On 07.21.08

well spoken. discussion conceded.

Album Rating: 4.5

I know its been said like a hundred million times but I love this album so much right now.

Album Rating: 5.0

yeah, it is so great.

i should probably get around to listening to this.

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

my vinyl came in the mail ^__^

Album Rating: 5.0

is it warped?

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

it is of high quality