Although I disagree about Bellamy's vocals, we both see that they sing differently.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Didn't like this review.
Sorry. It was too...idk.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
...I have no idea how to improve upon "idk" haha. Either way, thanks for the comments, and thanks to everyone else for their comments too.
On the Muse/Radiohead topic, I have never understood the comparison. Yorke and Bellamy are the only similarity between the bands and even then, there's absolutely no way anyone would ever mistake Bellamy for Yorke or vice verse. Their voices are so completely different, they just both use similar techniques. In my opinion, anyway.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
It's wordy. That's about it.
And the whole Muse/Radiohead topic is moronic in the first place. Muse is a lot heavier, aggressive, and more spacy than Radiohead. Muse has a lead signer who signs falsetto. That's it. Let's see Yorke compose a riff as catchy as the riff to Plug In Baby or Stockholm Syndrome, eh?
That wasn't a downer to Radiohead. Just saying they are different styles of music.
|
| |
On the Muse/Radiohead topic, I have never understood the comparison. Yorke and Bellamy are the only similarity between the bands and even then, there's absolutely no way anyone would ever mistake Bellamy for Yorke or vice verse. Their voices are so completely different, they just both use similar techniques. In my opinion, anyway.
I completely agree with you, although I could easily see someone mistaking Yorke for Bellamy or vice versa, depending on which song they heard. But yeah, Muse are much more rock oriented and have many more energetic songs.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
MoonlightBleeding: Is wordy a bad thing in this instance?
MediocreAtBest: I suppose, if you'd heard say 1 Radiohead song and 1 Muse song, you might mistake them later on. If anyone ever actually took the time to listen to both bands a couple of times, I can't see them mistaking the two. They both have very unique voices.
|
| |
I like radiohead as much as the next guy. but sputnik nutjocks this record to pieces... radiohead is an incredible band and most of this stuff compared to past standards of their band is just average.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
Ummm...no.
|
| |
[quote=me] but sputnik nutjocks this record to pieces [/quote]
[quote=average sputnik user opinion]
Ummm...no. [/quote]
my proof! =]
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Intro needs to go. You effectively recycled the same music/art comparison multiple times and it reads a bit wierd.
Other than that album is, and has always been, a 4 for me. Although i think it can only go up
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Radiohead is infinitely > than Muse.
Amnesiac is a wonderful record and this one is a lot better than I was honestly expecting it to be. And as far as "nutjocking" goes, I think there's been a good spread of opinion for this...
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
i dont understand why so many people put down amnesiac, i agree with cometuesday and EC, its a very good record, possibly my favourite radiohead album
btw your review was pretty good for your first
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
People put down amnesiac because there are no sing-alongs on that one. Sort of like this record.
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
why is Jay-Z reviewing Radiohead?
|
| |
|
|