The Rolling Stones Let It Bleed
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
NightProwler
May 21st 2013


7006 Comments


My fav is Exile too, this is pretty tied with Sticky Fingers for me. But all are soo good

Gyromania
Contributing Reviewer
May 21st 2013


38325 Comments


i haven't heard any of their albums proceeding some girls, and i for some reason haven't gotten around to sticky fingers yet

NightProwler
May 21st 2013


7006 Comments


I think Sticky Fingers was the first studio album by the Stones I heard in full. You should really check it out. I haven't heard all of their late albums either, just several songs off them. They have so many albums (and honestly, so many that aren't worth jack). I can't remember if Tattoo You is before or after Some Girls, but if you haven't heard it, I'd definitely recommend it!

Gyromania
Contributing Reviewer
May 21st 2013


38325 Comments


yea tattoo you is post-some girls. to be honest, their discography is just way too friggin long, and as you said a lot of it isn't worth checking out. i mean i love the stones, but i've heard 3 or 4 albums by them that did absolutely nothing for me. i'll check out tattoo you though, and sticky fingers. i've heard good things about both

NightProwler
May 21st 2013


7006 Comments


Definitely do so - but you're right about the rest, lol

KILL
August 2nd 2013


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

its just a shot away :D

sonictheplumber
August 2nd 2013


17600 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

some great songs but not huge on the album

ViperAces
August 2nd 2013


12609 Comments


opening and closing tracks are.
only got hot rocks though

KILL
August 2nd 2013


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

this is prob my fav of theirs but that could be said for most of their records yea

DominionMM1
August 2nd 2013


21542 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

best stones

sonictheplumber
August 2nd 2013


17600 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

my fav is beggars

DominionMM1
August 2nd 2013


21542 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

sticky fingers rules too

KILL
August 2nd 2013


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

dont see how dudes dig em more than the beatles tho

sonictheplumber
August 2nd 2013


17600 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

beatles so much better but the only people who dig stones more are usually like punk rock fags who like "street music" as opposed to creativity or innovation

DominionMM1
August 2nd 2013


21542 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

don't really care for the beatles' early stuff

sonictheplumber
August 2nd 2013


17600 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

beatles 65-69 is tops

KILL
August 2nd 2013


81582 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

rubber to abbey is like the best stretch ever



forgettin yellow submarine :D

DominionMM1
August 2nd 2013


21542 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

early stones > early beatles but obviously the beatles' late 60's output was better than the stones'

sonictheplumber
August 2nd 2013


17600 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

yea that dont count

sonictheplumber
August 2nd 2013


17600 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

and stones got some killer records but theyre just way too inconsistent they shoulda split in like 73



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy