Album Rating: 3.5
At my workplace there’s an ad on the wall of small chambers suitable for animal research and the photo of it looks exactly like the album cover, just humans replaced with mice. So I’m reminded on a daily basis to jam this.
|
| |
Is that the new project I heard about? Did they ever drop anything???
Shearling I mean?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Yeah album last year man it’s 1 track an hour something similar being to this but personally I think it’s better
|
| |
Yeah definitely worth checking out Shearling, it's a wild ride.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
This album and Shearling’s first would be so perfect with a little trimming and restraint. They both start out so incredible and feel mind blowing for a solid 30+ minutes but feel overstuffed and start to wear out their welcome after a while. I don’t even know what I would trim exactly, just that it’s overwhelming to listen to in one sitting lol
|
| |
It’s for sure overwhelming and I don’t entirely disagree… but I also don’t know what I’d trim so to me that just makes it feel like a “me” issue.
Amazing album but I’ve only listened to it once in a single sitting. These days I treat it as two records, the first of which ending after “Margin for Error” and with “We Think So Ill of You” as the track before that, which is actually how it is on the vinyl if I remember correctly, which also puts them at two pretty evenly split halves.
Even with this thing sitting in the corner of my room (among hundreds of other records tbf) I still forgot this band existed for a hot sec.
Catch me on the right day and I would say this record is a masterpiece but I have to be in a VERY specific mood.
|
| |
btw if that’s not how it is with We Think So Ill of You on vinyl then I have no idea where I got that idea from
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Who's the dingus who put Shearling's Motherfucker LP under this band's name on the albums page?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
haahh noticed that today
|
| |
|
|