Architects For Those That Wish to Exist
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
JayEnder
June 5th 2021


20096 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

The grammatical error in the title alone makes me hate this

Pikazilla
June 5th 2021


29918 Comments


mcdonaldscore

kalkwiese
June 5th 2021


10469 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

"The grammatical error in the title alone makes me hate this"



Since English isn't my first language: What would be correct? For Those Who Wish To Exist?

JayEnder
June 5th 2021


20096 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Yessir, that is correct.

kalkwiese
June 5th 2021


10469 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Ah, I see.



Tbh, I always got the title wrong in the beginning. I always read "For Those That Wish To Exit" and idk why lol. It sounded super depressed

rellik009
June 9th 2021


2034 Comments


"mcdonaldscore"

i will copyright strike you as a man of fairness

28Gloom
June 11th 2021


106 Comments


These guys have always been mediocre.

Veks
June 12th 2021


1842 Comments


Hollow Crown is good and the only release by them i really care about.

Veks
June 12th 2021


1842 Comments


I hate to be a pain but can't "that" be applied here if we consider it a group of people or type of person that "wishes to exist"?

"When you are determining whether you should use who or that, keep these simple guidelines in mind:

Who is always used to refer to people.
That is always used when you are talking about an object.
That can also be used when you are talking about a class or type of person, such as a team."



Purpl3Spartan
June 12th 2021


8685 Comments

Album Rating: 2.5

Perhaps, but in general it does sound clunkier

It’s a bad writing choice

CaliggyJack
June 12th 2021


10065 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

WE ARE THE RUST WORSHIPPING THE

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIN

LeddSledd
June 13th 2021


7444 Comments

Album Rating: 1.5

bad album yea

outliers
June 13th 2021


5022 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

aoty

veninblazer
August 9th 2021


16839 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

would've been better if they cut the three songs between animals and the closer, but im about to bump this rating up a little (3.5 from 3)

Gnocchi
Staff Reviewer
August 9th 2021


18258 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Cut three songs and then another three songs

veninblazer
August 9th 2021


16839 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

tbh i think the biggest issue is this album goes too long for what it is, were it more condensed then i'd be dropping a solid 4 here because i really dig the ideas they're going for.

Pikazilla
August 9th 2021


29918 Comments


nocte what in the fuck is that avi lmao

JayEnder
August 9th 2021


20096 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Much better than his old one.

Pikazilla
August 9th 2021


29918 Comments


yes but that was a really low bar to clear, let's be honest now

JayEnder
August 9th 2021


20096 Comments

Album Rating: 2.0

Shit creeped me out honestly lol



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy