Flying Lotus You're Dead!
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
deathschool
December 20th 2014


29479 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

what's the difference between going chronologically and in recommended order in terms of time spent



You can go to the album that fans of the artist typically consider to be their best, listen, and based on how much you enjoy it decide if some of the albums that are considered to be slightly lesser are worth listening to. It's really not that complicated or absurd. Y'all are just tripping hard.





treeqt.
December 20th 2014


16970 Comments


except you can't? you literally got no clue what the other albums sound like without listening to them.



Lord(e)Po)))ts
December 20th 2014


70256 Comments


People can pick out their favourites (mine being also LA) but hearing the artist or group evolve is
more rewarding than listening at random, like Neurosis


true but neurosis is also a perfect example of a band where you should not go completely chronologically... ie skip at least PoM and tWaL and then go chronologically

oltnabrick
December 20th 2014


41004 Comments

Album Rating: 3.0

or ?

deathschool
December 20th 2014


29479 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

@qtpie - Yes. Sometimes I disagree with the majority on what the best album by a band is (happens fairly often tbfh), but if it's

not an artist that you see yourself finding a perfect album by, then it's not that big of a deal to try to find out how other people

feel about their discog.

Relinquished
December 20th 2014


50089 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

idk I disagree there bruh, those are good records of their time and great crossover records

Lord(e)Po)))ts
December 20th 2014


70256 Comments



You can go to the album that fans of the artist typically consider to be their best, listen, and based on how much you enjoy it decide if some of the albums that are considered to be slightly lesser are worth listening to. It's really not that complicated or absurd. Y'all are just tripping hard.


well 'fans' are divided on what his best is. just fucking listen to la and then cosmo and then if u like those then until the quiet

also bogs is static? oops sorry for being mean to u

Lord(e)Po)))ts
December 20th 2014


70256 Comments


shitty deal dude i am just healing up from 9/10 cold/flu thing aggravated by drinking la cocaina, and shrooms /feels

Lord(e)Po)))ts
December 20th 2014


70256 Comments


deathschool is^^

Lord(e)Po)))ts
December 20th 2014


70256 Comments


i was referencing a deleted comment

treeqt.
December 20th 2014


16970 Comments


my point is and was that if you're actually listening to a discography it doesn't matter what order you go
by because you'll be able to connect dots where possible either way

if you need to be convinced to follow through on listening to a discography half-way through you should
probably start with the critically acclaimed albums first

deathschool
December 20th 2014


29479 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5





deathschool is^^







What did I do?

Lord(e)Po)))ts
December 20th 2014


70256 Comments


failed

deathschool
December 20th 2014


29479 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

I guess I should know better than to comment in any threads with Potts and qt by now. When oh when will I learn?

Lord(e)Po)))ts
December 20th 2014


70256 Comments


yes we are dastardly bastards

aok
December 20th 2014


4631 Comments


nickel plated dimes bang bang blow your mind

RoundOnEndHiInMiddle
December 20th 2014


922 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5 | Sound Off

*nickel-plated nine

Lord(e)Po)))ts
December 20th 2014


70256 Comments


rekt

Rowan5215
Emeritus
December 20th 2014


48421 Comments

Album Rating: 4.1

great thread

treeqt.
December 20th 2014


16970 Comments


thanks you for your contribution fam



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy