Album Rating: 3.0
Flawless album
|
| |
hes none of those ppl sea
theyre not that articulate, especially frogmaster
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
And I thought those Periphery threads were bad holy shit
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
bad user confirmed
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
@omaha all vaporwave grows off me relatively fast, but saint pepsi has the honor of being the cream of the crop
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
"yeah but you base your proof off of it L-OH-L so let's see you back it up a little."
It is pure reasoning and doesn't apply here.
|
| |
.........
|
| |
It is pure reasoning and doesn't apply here.
ok. explain it. "otherwise, this proof is exposed for the
intellectual fraud that it is." ...
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
Please. You don't even know the difference between a priori and a posteriori.
Challenge my premises or go away.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
or you could stop trying to argue pointlessly on a website thanks
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
This review is wrong.
|
| |
Please. You don't even know the difference between a priori and a posteriori.
Challenge my premises or go away.
I am challenging this premise.
4. To qualify as a genre of music, vaporwave must have an agreed upon definition, be shown to be distinctive from sound collage and have unique musical and conceptual qualities.
plz provide ur irrefutable reasoning lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
god damn this thread
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
That is not a refutation. You have only implied that it is refutable.
|
| |
That is not a refutation. You have only implied that it is refutable.
I'm just asking you to explain it plz that's all
not trying to critique your undergrad philosophy paper bruh
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
It's the fourth premise of my syllogism.
|
| |
ok cool can you back up that premise or explain it a little please it just strikes me as very weak and presumptuous in particular
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
In this instance, these are the conditions that would grant vaporwave status as a musical genre.
|
| |
In this instance, those are the conditions that would grant vaporwave status as a musical genre.
ya but why? why does vaporwave have to "have an agreed upon definition"? why must it "be shown to be distinctive from sound collage and have unique musical and conceptual qualities"? sorta sounds like you're just saying things to say them
eric in all kinds of fun discussions this wonderful saturday folks, glad you could join us if you're just tuning in
you know how I do
|
| |
Album Rating: 1.0
"why does vaporwave have to "have an agreed upon definition"?"
This is a property that is common to all identified genres of music.
"why must it "be shown to be distinctive from sound collage and have unique musical and conceptual
qualities?"
It shares far too many similarities with sound collage and other types of music to be considered its
own musical genre.
|
| |
|
|
