Underoath Ø (Disambiguation)
» Back to review

Comments:Add a Comment 
Uranium
November 4th 2010


7549 Comments


so are the lyrics about jesus or something

TomAkaVeto
November 4th 2010


1963 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

I'm putting this at a 5 just to spite all those who gave it a 1. Seriously, 1s should be reserved for "bands" like Brokencyde, Millionaires, etc.



I understand this can't be "Classic" yet. I've only been listening to it for 3 days.

dixoncocks
November 4th 2010


3247 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

You rated this a 1 after it being out for a day. How is that any different?

lukempls
November 4th 2010


235 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

it always irks me when people decide to rate something that they clearly wouldn't like. ie: death and black metal fans rating underoath, or anyone ever rating brokencyde.

JWT155
November 4th 2010


15039 Comments

Album Rating: 3.5

Nah, it's cool for brokeNCYDE.

Apollo
November 4th 2010


10691 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Vikings suck!



inb4 Hans

lukempls
November 4th 2010


235 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

idk man, i gotta listen to the album at least 2-3 times before I rate it. I think people have died from listening to a brokencyde album all the way through.. 2-3 times would be suicide.

lukempls
November 4th 2010


235 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

apollo, you clearly don't know much about vikings history. vikings fans arent fans because they think the team is good. they just love them, despite them being completely cursed. it's like being a cubs fan. we're masochistic.

1337Kellx
November 4th 2010


585 Comments


Lol at the comment about 4.5 and 5 ratings, those get you flamed most of the time ^^

And album is solid but not as good as im hearing, maybe i need to give it a few more listens...

But as The Acacia Strain always says "Don't believe the hype"

dixoncocks
November 4th 2010


3247 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

And as i always say "Don't listen to The Acacia Strain".

THIEF
November 4th 2010


240 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

1's, really?? That rating shouldn't even be an option. I can't understand how someone could objectively give this lower than a 2. From what I've heard so far, this album might be up there with Constellations

wyankeif1337
November 4th 2010


6739 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Now let's not get ahead of ourselves.

AmericnZero02
November 4th 2010


3954 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

Great review, man. I'm gonna hold off until tuesday to listen to this in full, but this review definitely helped get me excited about it. Spencer's lows sound stellar on the tracks I've heard. Oh, and their drummer's name is Daniel Davison :P

jubilee
November 4th 2010


17 Comments


album is definitely bringing out everyone's emotions, which is usually a sign of pure awesomeness

Curse.
November 4th 2010


8079 Comments

Album Rating: 4.0

This album is not as good as Constellations

1337Kellx
November 4th 2010


585 Comments


Lol at the comment about 4.5 and 5 ratings, those get you flamed most of the time ^^

And album is solid but not as good as im hearing, maybe i need to give it a few more listens...

But as The Acacia Strain always says "Don't believe the hype"

Josh D.
November 4th 2010


18184 Comments


kellx

dixoncocks
November 4th 2010


3247 Comments

Album Rating: 5.0

Still listening to The Acacia Strain i see...

unaffected
November 4th 2010


71 Comments

Album Rating: 4.5

Goddamn this shit is delicious. Like a fresh tangle with two sluts the morning after.

Josh D.
November 4th 2010


18184 Comments


Give'em a good rogering.



You have to be logged in to post a comment. Login | Create a Profile





STAFF & CONTRIBUTORS // CONTACT US

Bands: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z


Site Copyright 2005-2023 Sputnikmusic.com
All Album Reviews Displayed With Permission of Authors | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy