Album Rating: 3.5
Fuck, Ozzy sounds amaze on here m/
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.0
lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
ozzy >>>>> dio
in all respects, smd
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.8
I don't think anyone's saying Dio's (RIP) better than Ozzy, but both were amazing and super influential
|
| |
Agreed Ozzy rules on this
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Agreed Dio was always better.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
lol
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Heaven and Hell > Paranoid and all that jazz
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.8
Ozzy era sabbath and him as a singer is better than post 70s sabbath
|
| |
"Heaven and Hell > Paranoid"
Not even close
|
| |
Heaven and Hell doesn't have shit on any of the first three
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.8
Yeah but it's better than never say die and technical ecstasy
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
I'm not much into 70's Sabbath. Dio is pwntz
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Well you aren't into Sabbath then.
|
| |
Its like saying you aren't into 80s Maiden but love the post-2000 stuff
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
^^^^^
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
Ya uh huh. I find their old stuff inconsistent bc I find myself only enjoying half the songs. Heaven and Hell was much more my cup of tea.
|
| |
If you guys actually listened to H&H ignoring the vocal parts and did the same with Paranoid, you'd realize how superior the latter is to the former.
|
| |
Album Rating: 3.5
No reason to ignore the vocals when they're an obviously important aspect of the music, though. You could take any band that had member switch-ups and say "ignore the X on their old/new stuff and their old/new stuff is totally superior!!!!" So? The songwriting in certain areas doesn't define how you appreciate a given musical work; it's the culmination of all the aspects of a work that make it enjoyable or not.
And I like the Dio Years better 8|
|
| |
Band chemistry in the Ozzy Era > band chemistry in the Dio Era
I do think MR in particular is pretty sweet though, Vinnie did nice work
on it.
Band sounds tired to me on H&H, I'm thinking of reviewing it eventually
from a revisionist perspective.
|
| |
|
|
