Album Rating: 4.5
"You only jamming this now?"
Yeah
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
And it has the best chorus in all existence soooo
Also, tell me what you think when done
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
It's a 5 so far
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Almost every Bowie album from the 70s to early 80s is 5 worthy tbh
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Starman is an immediate favorite off this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Sounds, have you seen The Martian? They used Starman in that movie.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I've wanted to see that since it came out
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
Ok this 2012 remaster does this album fuckin wonders. The clipping is a shame but this sounds way too good now
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Modern remasters are unnecessary
let 60s albums sound like they're from the 60s and 70s albums from the 70s and 80s albums from the 80s etc.
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.6
"Modern remasters are unnecessary"
the Wilson remasters of the King Crimson discog tho
|
| |
Album Rating: 5.0
because starman has the same melody as somewhere over the rainbow
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
Great so King Crimson can sound like Porcupine Tree that's what we all want ;)
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I respectfully disagree, especially when the production ends up sounding "outdated" or the artist ends up not liking it in retrospect (like Bowie himself said he was dissatisfied with the production job on both this and Station to Station), or it just flat out sucks.
The problem is that a lot of "modern remasters" just do nothing more than brickwall the original recording, otherwise there isn't anything really fundamentally wrong with remastering an album unless the artist in someway expresses disapproval of it
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
If it's from an era, it's okay for it to sound outdated
That's part of its charm
"or the artist ends up not liking it in retrospect"
The trashy 80s version of We're Only in It for the Money happened because of this
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.6
that's because Zappa was a hack, Ars
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.6
also if an album sounds like garbage, a remaster can make all the difference
mastering an album is already hard enough as it is, it's not charming if an album sounds bad or is dated
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.6
"If it's from an era, it's okay for it to sound outdated"
what
"Great so King Crimson can sound like Porcupine Tree that's what we all want ;)"
no
the original mixes of Lizard, Islands and Larks were all fucking garbage. it's a miracle Fripp decided to remaster the discography
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.0
I mean everything is from an era isn't it?
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
dont forget the recent rush remaster of vapor trails.
or remix or something apparently
|
| |
Album Rating: 4.5
I never thought Ziggy Stardust, Station to Station, or pretty much any of Bowie's albums had poor production, but I do feel like tampering with that production robs it of its original sound
it just means that many people today won't hear those songs that same way people did in the 1960s/70s/80s
|
| |
|
|
